Tag: development

  • Demolition of home in Loveland Historic District causing uproar

    Demolition of home in Loveland Historic District causing uproar

    The Loveland’s Historic Preservation and Planning Commission has voted to allow the demolition of this home at 200 Railroad Avenue.

    Loveland, Ohio – Not many stories that we have published in our 20-year history has generated more FaceBook comments than the story we first broke on October 16 about resident Deidre Hazelbaker appealing the decision by Loveland’s Historic Preservation and Planning Commission to allow the demolition of a home in Historic Downtown.

    Demolition of historic home in Loveland’s Historic District under appeal

    _____________

    MORE BACKGROUND: Six, three-story apartments proposed adjacent to Nisbet Park on Loveland Bike Trail

    _____________

    Kat Hennessey I wonder if they know that every square inch of the place doesn’t need to be developed

    Marian HuntKat Hennessey no they don’t. Strip every inch & build build build.

    Marian Hunt They threw in a turn lane & a parking lot & you still can’t drive thru Loveland. Traffic is horrible.

    Natalie Nicole Oh yes let’s keep over developing, building things people can hardly afford, & erasing all signs of the past. Such a stellar idea!

    Zachary Hunt Stop building apartments.

    Barb Van Orsdel GREED!!!! Another piece of our history demolished!!!! My friends home on Montgomery Rd, in Montgomery, built in 1803, part of the “Underground Railroad”, demolished last week!!! And so it goes…History vs Greed!!!

    Kimberly Geiger Niehaus …and where are these proposed renters going to park??? Leave Historic Loveland alone!!!

    Jennifer Armour Blust Nor more apartments! We have too many!

    Birtha Mae Hutchinson Loveland has lost enough of the hometown I grew up in and loved telling everyone where I grew up! People have absolutely no idea what it was like back in the 60’s, 70’s, 80’s when you talk to them about Loveland. I was Proud to grow up there! It’s really sad what has become of our small town

    Krista Lynn Ruff And where is everyone going to park ?

    Eric Bee Apartments as far as the eye can see!

    Michael Kean It’s even got a historic skylight!

    Laurie Cione Just leave it be

    Austin Dean Harris Nooooo we can’t even get through the roads at the moment in Loveland… it can’t handle the traffic

    Donald Dunford What we need in Loveland, is some memories of the way Loveland us to look like, and not money signs in the city’s eyes. Some town’s keep some Historic sites Historic. When the memory’s are gone what’s left.

    Megan Jackson Hook Respectfully to all the commenters and to Ms. Hazelbaker, I’m just curious if the owner of the building is getting a payout that is hard to say “no” to, and that by designating this building an historic one puts their personal choice at risk. Just a thought. I actually love this building – it’s adorable. And it does keep our “old town” appeal for sure. But just trying to look at it from the owner’s point of view. I wouldn’t want to tell someone that they couldn’t sell their property.

    Will Dartnall Megan Jackson Hook agree!

    Deidre Evans Hazelbaker Megan Jackson Hook I fully respect the property rights of the owner and their ability to sell or develop 200 Railroad Avenue. However, it’s important to note that the property is located within Loveland’s historic district, which was designated in 2015, and is recognized as a contributing structure. When John Hill purchased the property in February 2021, these guidelines were already in place. While the sale or development of the property is possible, any changes must comply with the preservation guidelines established to maintain the historical character of the district.

    Megan Jackson Hook Deidre Evans Hazelbaker Duly noted! Thank you so much, truly, for educating me on the process. I am hoping that they can come to a solution that meets the guidelines that were put in place to maintain the integrity and charm of our little town.

    Deidre Evans Hazelbaker Agree. I appreciated your concern. It is always good to look at things from multiple angles.

    Sherry Hamlin Megan Jackson Hook It should also be noted that the owner of this building is not a “private resident”. It is Infuse Holding, a John Hill Company. As part of the justification for why it doesn’t make financial sense to renovate, they’ll pay themselves $36,600. To this I say, huh?!

    So as a comparison, if I renovate my own home for $50k, but I pay myself $36k to serve as the general contractor, was it a $50k renovation, or a $86k renovation?
    All I really did was move money from one bank account to another.

     

    Megan Jackson Hook Sherry Hamlin I wish I understood the intricacies of this kind of transaction. Like I said, I just hope that I can reach an amicable conclusion.

    Karen Arnett I sure hope that the appeal effort succeeds in preserving the building

    Larry Wallace Looks like a nice little 2 apartment building to me

    Amber Browning NO ABSOLUTELY NOT!! NO MORE 3 STORY STRUCTURES IN THAT SMALL TOWN SPACE.

    Bill Stewart It seems more out ot place than the monstrosity across the street.

    Cincy Brit Can’t they put these cheap stacked shoebox apartments somewhere else. Maybe where there’s a declining strip mall. Taking down historical buildings destroys the charm that draws people to Loveland.

    Jason Gulbrandson Here, have some government

    Cindy Ludlow Don’t build it!

    Traci Ballinger Butrum Oh wow! Totally trying to ruin historic downtown!

    Logan Thomas I think many dont realize Loveland doesn’t have an industry tax base like mason for example. Loveland is very heavy residential and therefor taxes are high and city encourages new developments.

    John Hoin Logan Thomas Landscaping is pretty much the official industry of Loveland.

    Steve Smith I’d like to know how much it sold for. What if the city of Loveland offered to buy the house and land or a group of people to prevent it from being torn down and turned into another apartment complex?

    Halie Suzy Rebeccaschild Deidre, what do you think of a cooperative ownership? How about a new building for a new organization that takes historic conservation seriously. How does the Loveland Historical Conservancy sound?

    Catherine Monceaux Demolition should have never been granted without the committee first having an architecture firm complete a feasibility study and assessment of the current home so that they have an accurate understanding of all options to restore and associated costs. To approve demolition of a historically significant building without doing basic due diligence first is irresponsible, especially on the part of a historic preservation committee whose job it is to protect this building.

    Andrew Bateman Catherine Monceaux who should pay the cost for a feasibility study?

    Catherine Monceaux Andrew Bateman The Commission. It’s their job to preserve and protect buildings deemed historically significant.

    Doug Tieman the current fire station in down town will be next

    Because of the new fire station more modern etc
    Wonder what that property will become 
    At the corner of main

    Jim Fatsy There isn’t any old Loveland! They are trying to be the next Oakley/Hyde Park!

    Erik Snider Milford has the same problem.

    Dean Osborne Why not do a traffic study add those cars in there you go more traffic in downtown it’s like putting 50lbs in a 5 lb bag it won’t work I blame the city council on this why not concentrate on the Loveland Madeira corridor that’s how most of them got put on council

    Kathy Bryan Lyttle They keep going and there won’t be any more “old” in Loveland

    Karen Ryba Garbarino They are building on west Loveland by the State Farm office. I believe they are putting 3 apartments there. If the ones they want to build in the location of this yellow house are similar, it is not at all appropriate for this location. They are tall and modern with front garages.

    Amber Dawn Karen Ryba Garbarino I bet it is

    Kathy Bryan Lyttle Karen Ryba Garbarino and that location is just asking for trouble

    Erin Harper Karen Ryba Garbarino those are townhouses for sale … $849,000……

    Brenda Lindner Erin Harper 4 townhomes

    Amy Hanifen-Simon Erin Harper that’s crazy high and you get to overlook the worst part of town for that money lol

    Sharon Charlie Martin Yep…just as expected…money talks. Promote the city as an old historic city…then tear down history in the name of progress…these developers would level the whole city if we let them. This is why Milford is eons ahead of Loveland in attracting new businesses and residents.

    Halie Suzy Rebeccaschild Sharon Charlie Martin There’s something about Loveland that attracts parasitic opportunism.

    John Hoin Sharon Charlie Martin Is it though?

    Jeremy Mitchell John Hoin yes

    Debbie Atkins Harvey No more apartments!! Save old Loveland!!!

    Emily McAtee Egan Loveland does not need anymore complexes. It can barely handle the # of residents now

    Amy Brown-Prather Emily McAtee Egan exactly!!! Moved here 17 years ago because it had small town feel/ charm not anymore.  can’t go anywhere near downtown Loveland on the weekend

    Erik Snider Emily McAtee EganWe no longer go there because it’s impossible to find parking.

    Emily McAtee Egan Erik Snider It is! Even with the new parking lot, it’s even worse

    Natalie Elizabeth So keep taking away the charm that is Loveland? I’ve lived here all my life, and while I adore the businesses in original buildings, the new excess is gross, the parking a nightmare, and the apartments are an eye sore! Stop!

    Darlene Turner No More!! They are destroying Historic Loveland!! Thank God someone is fighting for our town!!

    Mary Ann Crawford Please do not destroy any more great memories of Old Loveland. I stay away from Loveland on weekends.

    Cris Jordan NO!!! Places like these small, unique, historic homeskeep Loveland charming! Think of all the traffic and havoc this will create!!! There will be no place to park and enjoy this unique little town!

    Brian Brokaw Its all about the money

    Robin Cox Geohegan Please, don’t erase even more of the history in our town. No more apartments “downtown”

    Steve Smith We need a protest

    Tracy Eaton Sounds like big cluster F

    Darlene Turner Who is on this committee? To just tear down historical houses?? Where can we see this. And are they voted in there??

    Bill Hickman Probably some wealthy yuppie wants to build a 7 story town house.

    Erik Snider Bill Hickman Bingo

    Don Tillery Six unit apartment will need 12 parking spots and be available to only renters with extra $$$ or an expensive Airbnb. Why would people who are part of a historic society want apartments over history?

    Bob Pauly It’s a shame that the roots of historical Loveland is being replaced by generic everywhere structures.

    Christopher Smith John Hill greed+ Loveland’s greed= more apartments, bad traffic,& poor quality of life for the citizens of Loveland.

    This is literally the worst place in Loveland to build apartments.

     

    Lou Lehnhoff More apartments = more burden on schools

    Jeremy Mitchell Lou Lehnhoff also police, and fire and rescue.

    Sharon Senters Burton I’m am not only a resident of 24 years in Loveland but also a Realtor and we are real estate investors as well! We always try to keep the character and add more benefits for the neighborhood that we flip in. Looking for our next investment property! I’d love to do the same here. Loveland is known for its history and downtown charm. We need to preserve more of that!!

    Halie Suzy Rebeccaschild Bring your wallet to the meeting on 10/30. We are starting a new political action committee.

    Please let your connections know, Mike Deidre.

     

    Scott Nordheim Loveland government has destroyed the place

    Cassie Wolfe Cote Noooo!

    Steve Smith NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

    Adam Noschang Typical lol

    Jamie B Pritchard How can we be a part of this discussion? Is there someone we can contact or a meeting to attend?

    Deidre Evans Hazelbaker Jamie B Pritchard The appeal regarding the demolition of a historic home in Loveland’s historic district will take place on October 30th at 5:30 pm at Loveland City Hall. You can signup to speak on the sheet when you walk in. If you can’t make it, message me. I am collecting letters.

    Carolann Luider Jamie B Pritchard please do not let any more historic areas be destroyed we already lost so much with the two apartments we have now and the train being stopped when they bought near the tracks we truly lost the small historic town we moved here for and the attraction was a part of the success of the bike trail and the home town shops and restaurants and sports bars. We already made almost in possible for the seniors who lived and loved this town to come due to parking if you a find near the restaurants possible handicap spots are very few and the new parking is not really handy for handicap people to use all the areas for shopping and eating the spots by the old train station right in the heart of town are not marked for seniors which would we the perfect area. The historic places and events and places made our town do not destroy what made what we are today

    Brook Drummond

    Good – we need to preserve our history. I was so sad to see what happened to the Sweet Shop.
    Karen Hoffmann Hay Brook Drummond what happened to the Sweet Shop? Is this the store next to Paxtons or closer to the bike path?

    Halie Suzy Rebeccaschild Mark your calendars! The appeal regarding the demolition of a historic home in Loveland’s historic district will take place on October 30th at 5:30 pm at Loveland City Hall.

    I always suspect meetings are scheduled by those in favor of development at the most inconvenient times purposely to discourage community input.
    The 5:30 time on a weekday may be difficult for some, but we hope you’ll make every effort to be there to pack the room and hall.
    Your presence could make a difference. If you can’t attend, consider writing a letter to be read at the meeting.
    After the meeting, I’m organizing residents in favor of a fresh city council to start a local political action committee for the purpose of electing Loveland Council members interested in conservation of what’s left of historic buildings and green spaces.
    Bring a fresh $10 or $20 to be among founding members. (Other payment methods accepted.)

    Ellen Mershon

    So when do we stop calling it historic Loveland?
    Mike Lieser Ellen Mershon , oh it’s history……
    Ellen Mershon “The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise and Decline of America’s Man-Made Landscape” ~ James Howard Kunstler is an interesting read. We keep giving away our identity one bulldozer at a time.

    Wendy Warner Ransom The report confirms it’s an old house in bad shape. It does not address viability of repair. Would it be expensive and challenging, sure, but it’s possible. It’s also biased since it was done by the people who want to demolish.

    Regardless, the proposed apartments do not fit the aesthetic of the area. Might as well put in a glass and steel high rise. It will stick out like a sore thumb. Why can’t something more sympathetic to the old town vibe be designed? A historic face with and updated interior would be fantastic.
    Robert Schille Wendy Warner Ransom Wendy, both my wife and me moved to Loveland back in 2006. The downtown portion of Loveland is much different from today. The first half dozen years, downtown was a more easy paced, quiet place to go to. Parking was easy to find and much easier to navigate through downtown. We used to walk the bike trail on Saturday afternoons. We stopped doing this over five years ago, instead we travel over to Terrace Park’s portion of the bike trail. There is so much high octane activity on weekends anymore. We also refuse to pay for parking. The only time now that I even consider driving to downtown to use the trail is during the weekday mornings. I know that this is not directly related to this story, though it is related
    Halie Suzy Rebeccaschild Wendy, (If you’re a resident,) I hope you’ll consider speaking at the meeting. Every resident voice matters.

    Michael J Head

    Historic? What makes it historic? The fact that it is old and run down? Did George Washington sleep there?  Not every old dump is historic. Real estate is there to serve the needs of those alive TODAY. As far as I am concerned so called preservationist (virtue signalling nags) should have to raise the money to buy it and maintain it. They should not be allowed to interfere with the property rights of the owners.
    Robert Schille Michael J Head Every person that is a Loveland resident has the right to voice their opinion on this issue, whether or not they are preservationists. While I am on it, I will voice my suggestion. Every developer that is responsible for overcrowding communities such as Loveland for the purpose of Greed, should be forced to take up residence in the same place that they create overcrowded conditions. Let them experience the same living conditions. Overcrowded roads and schools, having to pay property taxes in order to fix the problems resulting from being overcrowded.
    Sharon Mitchell Scovanner Michael J Head, the city of Loveland has said that the downtown area is historic. You may have seen the signs around town that say ‘historic downtown’ Loveland. Additionally, there is a specific ‘historic district’ that has special protections. This structure was deemed as a ‘contributing structure’ within the historic district which requires the owner to maintain the building. When buying property, any prospective buyer should do their due diligence to determine if there are restrictions.
    Sara Skierkiewicz That’s what downtown Loveland needs…another apartment building.
    Sharon Mitchell Scovanner Thanks Loveland Magazine for getting the word out on this property! Plan to attend or write a letter to let the committee know your thoughts.
    Dean Osborne I’m surprised they havent torn down the city hall and the fire house to put up more of the nasty condos
    Autumn Beverly That’s disgusting. Too many apartments in Loveland already over-congesting the whole town. Way to ruin the trail too.
    Steve Smith Imagine a 3 story apartment complex right there in the middle of RR Avenue
    Steve Smith My suggestion is to instead tear down Loveland Station and replace it with lovingly reconstructed building from our historic past.
    Meranda Leigh South Steve Smith right! My grandparents owned all the land that is now 1500 apartments. And the building that we called the bishop building but where tanos is. I have watched as they destroyed and “modernized” every good memory and everything that made this town Loveland.
    Kennadee Hesse How in the hell are they going to fit apartments there? Absolutely not needed
    Meranda Leigh South Kennadee Hesse right as if parking isn’t bad enough, they want to add congestion? I guess I’m going to start going to city hall meetings and I suggest we all do.
    Meranda Leigh South They need to stop. Can we not have anything that reminds of us how Loveland used to be?
    Claudia Stars Who’s bright idea was it to add apartments to the busiest place in town, let alone a historic place? I love Loveland for it’s openness and nature, not the 4 story complexes blocking the skies and destroying trees and historic sites…lord above this is terrible.
    Debbie Roach Meyer Terrible proposal. Look what happen to Montgomery. Character and history lost forever.
    Alesha Marie Cossentino Leave historical Loveland alone. What’s left of it
    Lori Ashmore-Wittwer Horrible idea! This sucks!!! I wish Loveland would stop tearing down historical homes and buildings and building more apartments….sad
    Victoria Elizabeth Stop developing loveland. I’m only about to be 30 years old and the town I once loved is just about gone.

    Shelley King It’s all about MONEY with these greedy developers. I grew up in Loveland and would like nothing more than to move back there when I retire. But with current home prices there, it’s not even a possibility.

    These developers are trying to cash-in on the appeal of being a Loveland resident, but part of that appeal is it’s historic charm!
    Shame on them for holding the almighty dollar above historic relevance.
    Catherine Steele-Trickey I hope this building gets saved. Historic Loveland is losing all its history. What makes Loveland special is slowly getting destroyed due to greed. I am honestly in shock that John Hill Construction is a part of this. I wish they would volunteer their time and effort to help restore that building instead of tear it down. Very disheartening to hear of this.
    Charity Kuzuhara People come from all over to enjoy Loveland’s many historical and natural gifts. Tearing this building down and other historical structures will pave the way for the end of the charm that Loveland used to have. I remember that an identical house used to stand right next to this one, but it was torn down. We can’t get that history back.
    Diane Hensley Can you move it?
    Kristie Dunn I’ve always loved that little house. 6 units ? Sheesh.
    Barbara Kuhn McClendon Do not destroy this. The apt bldg is for some this is for all too enjoy and remember when.

    Dee Miller Loveland powers that be won’t be happy til all of downtown is a concrete jungle of apartments.

    This explains why they hustled so much to install the new parking lot.
    Nekisha Lanum It’s a shame what they’re doing to Loveland.
    Mary Lee Karle Would be a great place to live
    Megan Bowers Too much congestion!!
    Joan Daunt-Wallace Stop the madness!
    Joan Daunt-Wallace Goodbye old Loveland!
    Harry Lofland It needs to be saved
    Meranda Leigh South Harry Lofland I’ll see you all at the next city hall meeting?
  • [VIDEO] Diane Fisher testifies to be a good daughter and son of Loveland’s Mother Earth

    [VIDEO] Diane Fisher testifies to be a good daughter and son of Loveland’s Mother Earth

    David Miller – Editor and Publisher

    by David Miller

    Loveland, Ohio – Loveland resident Diane Fisher testified at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on May 4 about the re-zoning of Grailville and a proposed new development near her home on Oak Street.

    Fisher started by expressing how nervous she was about speaking publicly, however, speaking softly and determined told why she chose to live in Loveland, “…enjoying the mental and physical, and spiritual health that being in nature provides.” Referring to the COVID 19 Pandemic she said that activities in nature have proven more important than ever to many people she knows.

    Fisher also noted that it wasn’t lost on her that the meeting was being held in both “No Mow May” and “Mental Health Awareness Month.”

    It wasn’t a rhetorical question Fisher then asked, “How many more lawns filled with pesticides and herbicides, should be allowed, invited, encouraged into our area.”

    “Each of us. Every person is a steward of our community,” Fisher challenged.

  • A greater vision for the intrinsic beauty of the Grailville land

    A greater vision for the intrinsic beauty of the Grailville land

    by Elizabeth Robinson

    Dear Fellow Lovelanders,

    I want to speak to you about vision and make sure you are aware of an important ongoing process before the Loveland Planning and Zoning Board and Loveland City Council. Drees Homes is requesting a change in the current low-density zoning status on 110 lovely acres of green unspoiled land, with historic buildings, currently owned by Grailville (The Grail). This land sits between where East Loveland Avenue turns into O’Bannonville Road and Rte 48. Drees desires this zoning status change to put 209 homes on this green space.

    The Grail Mission and Vision Statement speaks of Care for The Earth. This has always been vital to Grailville/The Grail in its history and practice. Grail members including myself are expressing significant and ongoing distaste that the Grail is seriously considering divesting itself of this land to Drees to build another subdivision in our town.

    There are important long-term practical reasons why many Loveland residents have spoken AGAINST enabling a zoning status change proposed by Drees to build 209 homes. They include, among others, an overcapacity school system, aggravating already clogged traffic and infrastructure concerns including sewer and water. (Please reference the below open letter to Loveland residents by Elizabeth Murphy for more details on these pressing issues)

    I want to concentrate here on a compelling and magnanimous (great of mind or heart) vision of protection from development such as the proposed Drees subdivision. Standing up for a NO vote on this zoning status change from low density is a very important first step.

    If the Grail is determined to divest itself of this land, are we as citizens willing to stand up for a vision that will honor the cultural and spiritual history of the Grail on this land, and also stand up for the inestimable value of added community green space which will do so much more than another subdivision to keep Loveland a treasured place to live into the future?

    I wonder: If Loveland has the foresight to reject this proposed Drees zoning change, would The Grail accept significantly less money from the city or other entity committed to a higher vision that cares for the earth and the people of Loveland?

    I have lived in Loveland all my life and our Loveland Bike Trail was just such a vision. There were many who could not see the immensely positive difference this green path of natural beauty that intersects our town and all enjoy, would make for the future of Loveland. It is with gratitude we now look back and honor those who had vision and were tenacious, so we could see the flowering of that vision.

    Today Loveland is thriving. With that has come some of the problems of success mentioned earlier such as traffic and stress on infrastructure. We can make decisions now that see another subdivision that destroys precious green space and exacerbates traffic and stressed infrastructure will not be a decision that is truly good for the future of Loveland.

    Loveland citizens will thank us years from now if we reserve green and natural places for the good of all, as did those bike trail visionaries.

    I ask the Loveland Planning and Zoning Commission and Loveland City Council to reject this Drees proposed zoning change. Reject it not only on very real practical matters such as traffic and infrastructure, but to support a greater vision of the intrinsic beauty and value added of green spaces for Lovelanders into the future.

    Sincerely,

    Elizabeth Robinson

    East Loveland Avenue


     April 11, 2022
    
    Dear Fellow Loveland Residents,
    
    It is important that you are aware of a process which is now ongoing involving 110 acres of Grailville land between Rt.48 and O’Bannonville Rd. Loveland City Council and the Zoning Board will have to make a decision on the Drees Homes’ request for a change in the zoning status to allow them to build 209 homes on that land.
    
    The iniPal public hearing drew a standing room only crowd. Everyone who spoke, with the excepPon of the Drees representaPves, requested that the Zoning Board say NO to the Drees proposal. There are important long-term reasons why it is best for our community that the Drees proposal does not go forward.
    
    We all know the traffic situaPon in downtown is bad now. The construcPon of a large subdivision on this Grail land will iniPally cause several years of construcPon trucks and dirt funneling into town from Rt.48 and O’Bannonville Rd. As the houses are built and sold regular traffic of several thousand car “trips” through town will phase in. This will never stop.
    
    Our school system is currently overflowing recommended capacity. Extra trailers are needed for space. It is esPmated that 4-5 addiPonal classrooms of children are likely to be added by this subdivision. We are all painfully aware of the costs that would be incurred to build new schools, as well as the stresses on children and teachers involved in overcrowding. Again, once this increase is allowed to happen it is unlikely to be reversed.
    
    There are also serious general infrastructure issues relaPng to water. The Loveland water system is a series of wells which when run at high demand can drop the water table in a significant way. One must ask at what point will this become a problem. Water pressure has at Pmes been an issue and more homes drawing water cannot but aggravate this.
    
    The other end of this problem is the management of the addiPonal sewage. The sewer line under East Loveland Ave. is outdated, fragile, and it is quesPonable whether it is adequate to handle a large new neighborhood. The receiving Polk Run sewage treatment plant has no more room to expand. There has been no confirmaPon of sewer availability, capacity, or access compliant with MSD standards. Will the City of Loveland be put in a posiPon of providing this infrastructure at Loveland residents' expense? With the Liale Miami River so nearby it is crucial that there be no chance of contaminaPon.
    Natural rainwater run-off must also be considered. The land from White Pillars on slopes to the northwest. The homes along O’Bannonville Rd. are all in the path of this natural drainage and vulnerable to surface flows or overflowing of Bares Run Creek in Pmes of heavy rain. The new roads and houses will eliminate acreage which currently absorbs the rainwater and so more will conPnue on downhill.
    
    The final thing I need to speak of is the special quality of this parPcular piece of land. For about 80 years women of The Grail have lived or worked there. They have tended the land, holding it, knowing the sacred nature of this place. As the Grail has shared access to their land with others
    for walking and connecPng with nature, many have become aware of the spiritual calm which it provides. In today’s world we need this more than ever.
    
    In conclusion, I would encourage everyone who feels that we do not need another big subdivision on this Grailville land, with all the negaPve side-effects, to please make your views known. Aaend the public meePngs (the next is on May 4), write or call members of the Zoning Board and City Council. In our country we have government of ciPzens for ciPzens. Our officials have a duty of honor to listen to the members of the community which they serve. They are us; and therefore, we must speak so they may be guided.
    
    Sincerely, 
    
    Elizabeth Murphy - Fallis Road Loveland OH
    

    The Grailville Archive

    Because posterity may wish to know.

  • [Video Archive] The holy nature of Grailville for a teenage girl

    [Video Archive] The holy nature of Grailville for a teenage girl

    David Miller is the Editor and Publisher of Loveland Magazine

    Our continuing series about Grailville and its rich cultural past

    by David Miller

    Loveland, Ohio– This interview with artist Trina Paulus by Alana Johnson was 11 years ago and conducted during the Advent season. We are into Holy Week, however, this interview will give you a nice glimpse into Grailville at the time and a “Way-Back Machine” view. Not much is being said about the dining hall at Grailville, however, with its large open space and expansive glass wall it was the perfect place to showcase art and you will see some extraordinary art in this interview.

    Paulus came to Grailville in 1949 as a teenager. She said it was a magnificent change for her even though the living circumstances then were extremely simple and sometimes primitive. “The cultural experience was a high art form.” She now lives in Montclair, New Jersey, however, returned to Grailville for the Advent Season in 2011 to talk about her work, as well as Grailville’s collection of over forty Nativity scenes from around the world.

    In talking about that particular Christian Advent season, Paulus described the global time we were living in as a period of, “preparation for the great change that we know is coming, but cannot yet predict.” She called it, “The pregnant time – the fuller coming of God into our hearts and the fuller coming of God into our world”

    Paulus started sculpting at the age of eight in Cleveland Heights, Ohio with mud from the creek in her back yard. She won national awards as a high schooler. She is now 90 years old and doing well.

    In this LOVELAND MAGAZINE TV VIDEO, Reporter Alana Johnson interviews Paulus in the dining hall at Grailville where Paulus had many of her Advent sculptures on display as part of their International Creche Exhibit.

    Of particular interest in the interview is Paulus’ description of life at Grailville in 1949 and the spiritual life there. Paulus describes life on the Grailville farm as a magnificent change for her. She said it seemed she was living in the Chartres Cathedral. “Our cultural life was a high art form.”

    In 1972, Paulus wrote the book, Hope for the Flowers. It is now translated into many languages and there are over two million copies in print.

    Grailville, just outside of Loveland was an environmental, education, and retreat center of The Grail, an international women’s movement. At the time of this interview, it was located on 300 acres, with organic gardens, hiking trails, woods, pastures, ponds, creeks, modest guest housing, and solitude.

    The Grailville Store featured fair-trade items, gifts, and specialty items from Grailville and Grail artists.

    To read more about the rich history of Grailville and its cultural significance check out Loveland Magazine’s:

    The Grailville ArchineBecause posterity may wish to know.







  • Tim Butler: “I humbly ask for your support for the next four years on City Council.”

    Tim Butler: “I humbly ask for your support for the next four years on City Council.”

    by Tim Butler

    Four years ago, you trusted me with your vote to City Council. Now I humbly ask for your support for the next four years on City Council. With over 32 years of living in and raising our family in Loveland, I have a strong commitment to speak for our citizens. Our family is invested in the success of Loveland. We started a successful track and cross-country program which launched the running careers of hundreds of Loveland’s boys and girls. Our family has invested its time, financial resources, and energy in the creation and operation of Mile 42 Coffee in downtown Loveland. Our roots are firmly planted in Loveland. 

    We have a great city. Our downtown is vibrant and unique with its access to the bike path and the Little Miami River. We have a strong community spirit. We have successful local businesses. With our growth comes inherent challenges. 

    We are at a point where the decisions made by your City Council will affect the character, look, and feel of Loveland for future generations. Here are a few key areas where Council’s decisions will impact Loveland going forward: 

    • The first is zoning and development. Our Council has approved the rezoning demands of developers which increased the density of development and will contribute to further congestion. I listened to your fellow citizens and voted against this rezoning. Council will face similar zoning and development questions over the next four years. 
    • Second is how we manage traffic and parking downtown. Our Council is considering a multi-million dollar parking garage and we do not know whether it is even financially sustainable. The location of the garage will cause overcrowding in the busiest part of our downtown. There are other options we can explore before we change the landscape of downtown for the next 30 years with a garage which may not even solve the problem. I have consistently asked Council to explore these options and explain to our citizens the financial impact of the garage and the availability of alternatives. 
    • The third is ensuring we fully involve our citizens as we make these and other decisions, including annexation of new property into the city. Unfortunately, our Council has not been fully transparent in this decision-making process. 

    As I talk to our fellow citizens, I hear concerns about the direction of our city and some of the decisions made by our City Council. How much development is too much? Are we spending your taxpayer dollars on pet projects? Are we sufficiently planning for the next generation of Loveland’s families so they can enjoy the kind of childhood our own children were fortunate enough to have? 

    Let’s take a breath and engage in thoughtful, analytical growth. Let’s seek out the opinions and gauge the wishes of our citizens. Let’s spend our tax dollars wisely. Let’s think and talk about what is best for the city of Loveland for the next ten to twenty years, so future generations will continue to think of Loveland as a wonderful place to live, work, and raise their families. 

    I ask for your support for reelection to Loveland’s City Council. If you trust me with your vote, I pledge to continue to serve as your voice on Council. Together, we can plan and build the best Loveland for the present and for our future. 


    Meet the candidate nights


    Candidate List and Voter Information

  • Grailville “options” 110 acres to Drees

    Grailville “options” 110 acres to Drees

    by David Miller

    Miami Township, Ohio – Loveland Magazine has confirmed today that Grailville and the Drees Company have signed a purchase agreement for development of 110 acres on the south side of their property located on O’Bannonville Road east of downtown Loveland.

    In March of 2019 the Loveland Board of Education entered into a contract for an option to purchase the real estate, however, last January after voters said they were not willing to put up the money, the Board voted to cancel the contract. The Board had hoped to use the land for the construction of a new campus with three school buildings hoping the schools would open in September of 2022.

  • Re-zoning for possible 28-Unit condo project proposed for North Second Street

    Re-zoning for possible 28-Unit condo project proposed for North Second Street

    Loveland, Ohio – An application has been submitted on behalf of Joe Farruggia with Zicka Homes to re-zone property off North Second Street (St. Rt. 48) south of the Sentry Hill subdivision with the potential use to build a 28-unit condominium development.

    A public hearing on the proposal is scheduled for this Wednesday, June 24 at  7:30 PM at City Hall. The public will have an opportunity to comment on the proposal.

     

    Assistant City Manager Tom Smith told Loveland Magazine this morning that a “concept of what could go in the area”, subject to the approval of the rezoning, could be 28 single-family attached townhomes. “The item up for discussion this Wednesday is for the rezone only. To date, no application has been submitted for the development of this area,” said Smith.

    City staff is recommending that the re-zoning be approved.

    The applicant is requesting re-zoning the property from the current zoning of Residential – Medium Density (R-MD) to Residential – Multi-Family (R-MF).

    The area consists of approximately 5.529 acres of undeveloped land.

    In a memo to the Planning and Zoning Commission dated June 24, Assistant City Manager Tom Smith said in part:

    It is the opinion of City staff that the proposed rezone would be consistent with the recommendations of the Downtown Strategic Plan, surrounding land uses, and poses very little significance in the disparity between the two zones in question. Therefore, City staff dos not believe that the integrity of the code, surrounding land uses, nor their density requirements will be jeopardized with regards to the applicant’s request for rezone.

    Policy Options

    Recommend the proposed recommendation to the City Council for approval, deny the proposed recommendation, or propose an alternative solution.

    Recommendation

    Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a favorable recommendation to the City Council for the approval of the applicant’s rezone request as stated in the applicant’s application.

    You can see the entire proposal that the Commission will debate here: Blossom Hill Project



     

     

  • [Videos and Photos] Citizens successfully organize to preserve their neighborhood

    [Videos and Photos] Citizens successfully organize to preserve their neighborhood

    Mihaela Manova

    by Mihaela Manova

    Loveland, Ohio – On February 4, the Loveland City Hall was filled with a crowd to witness and hopefully influence a vote for or against the building of an apartment complex at Loveland’s 102 Oak Street. As the meeting commenced, the public heard Rodney Sabo of Sabo Design Associates, describe the plans for the complex, budget, and method of parking and traffic.

    The proposal the Planning and Zoning Commission was considering during the public hearing was to build four 16 unit apartment buildings on Oak Street in the Clermont County side of the City. “Oak Apartments” would have been four levels each with parking garages below each building. The proposal was for 106 total parking spaces with 1.6 parking spaces per unit. The lot is 1.033 acres.

    Sabo Design submitted the application on behalf of their client, Hunt and Whitacre. To build the project the City would need to create a Special Planning District (SPD) which if approved would have erased the existing zoning restrictions and protections for the immediate neighborhood and create a separate zoning district with distinct restrictions, permissions, and guidelines.

    The current zoning of the immediate neighborhood is Residential-Medium Density (R-MD). The existing R-MD zone does not permit high-density multiple-family uses.

    Commission Chairman Al Kressler, Mark Redmond, Michael Kady, Brian O’Neill, and Tim Butler posed questions for the plan such as the possible rewards and pitfalls from the building of this complex before they each voted, “No”.

    In opposition to the plan, the public bound together to declare and stand for the preservation of the land and current zoning, as each speaker presented individual points to support their cause. Many of the points included environmental damage, blockage of people’s home views, out-of-place aesthetics, lowering of the water pressure, and the promotion of in-and-out rental, not community bound estates.

    The Commission heard both sides and decided with a 5-0 vote to not develop the land into an apartment complex.

    The filled room disbanded in agreement around 9:10 PM.

    Scroll down through this story to see a photo slideshow and watch post meeting interviews. You can watch the speeches during the open-forum, the proponent explaining the proposal, the staff report, and the questions P&Z had for the applicant.

    Oak Street Apartments Interviews

    Connie Crawford on Oak Street Apartment Proposal

    Julie Fuson comments of Oak Street Apt. proposal

    Neil Kluender wants his neighborhood protected


    Becky Hasselbeck speaking about preventing more apartments


    Steve DeFosset explains potential water supply problems if Apartments are built


    Todd Osborne talks about proper use of SPD Zoning


    Rocky Carpenter speaks up to preserve sanctity of his neighborhood


    Mary Ann Bird discusses Oak Apartment proposal


    Scott Lindgren talks about traffic conditions if Oak Street Apartments are built


    Mark Krum talks about tearing down a home built in 1870s to built apartments


    Cati O’Keefe lives immediately downhill from Oak Apartment and talked about how unstable the hillside is


    Real Estate Agent Keli Williams’s take on Oak Apartment proposal


    Tom Smith introduces staff report


    Rodney Sabo with Sabo Design Associates explains his proposal for Oak Apartments


    Oak Apartment designer answers P&Z questions



  • Tumbling and dance studio proposes to re-locate to vacant Donisi Mirror Company site

    Tumbling and dance studio proposes to re-locate to vacant Donisi Mirror Company site

    Loveland, Ohio – The City has received an application for a site plan review from  Steve and Vicki Wallace with The Premier Studio for Dance & Premier Tumbling. The property is 507 Loveland-Madeira Road. The previous user of the property was Donisi Mirror Company. The Wallaces plan to convert the property into a commercial school and art studio for tumbling and dance.

    Premier Tumbling & Dance is currently located in the Shoppers Haven Plaza and has been operating there since 2005.

    The Planning and Zoning Commission will consider a site plan on Tuesday, January 28 at 6 PM at the City Building.



  • 64 apartments proposed for Oak Street

    64 apartments proposed for Oak Street

    Editor’s Note:

    1-16-20 at 1:11 PM

    Sabo Design Associates wants readers to be aware that even though they applied for SPD designation for “Oak Apartments” that they are not the “Developer/Owner” of the property. They said in an Email to Loveland Magazine, “Sabo Design Associates is not the Builder, nor are we the Owner for this project. We simply designed the building for clients.”

    Sabo Design Associates declined to name their client however Loveland Magazine has since learned that the Client is Hunt and Whitacre, 550 Wards Corner Road and the current owner of 102 Oak Street is Wilma Conley.

    Loveland, Ohio – Sabo Design Associates with offices on Wards Corner Road has applied to build four 16 unit apartment buildings on Oak Street in the Clermont County side of the City. “Oak Apartments” will be four levels each with parking garages below each building. The proposal is for 106 total parking spaces with 1.6 parking spaces per unit. There will be 0′ set-back to the side and rear of existing properties.

    Sixty-four apartments are proposed in four-story buildings. The most recent apartment complex constructed and nearby is Loveland Station with 94 units on approximately 3 acres. Loveland Station was also made possible by SPD zoning.

    The parcel for Oak Apartments is approximately 1.033 acres.

    Sabo Design will need for the City to create a Special Planning District (SPD) which if approved will erase the existing zoning restrictions and protections for the immediate neighborhood and create a separate zoning district with distinct restrictions, permissions, and guidelines.

    The current zoning of the immediate neighborhood is Residential-Medium Density (R-MD). The existing R-MD zone does not permit high-density multiple-family uses.

    According to a memo written by Assistant City Manager Tom Smith to the Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) the applicant must first make a written finding that one or more of the following conditions exist, or will exist, within the proposed SPD:

      1. (a)  A concentration of retail and service oriented commercial establishments serving as a principal business activity center for the community.
      2. (b)  Land that is occupied by substantial natural characteristics worthy of preservation or which are historic aids to the identification of residential communities which help residents relate to their communities and to relate the social organization of communities to their physical environments.
      3. (c)  Lands which permit for ingenuity, imagination, and design efforts on the part of builders, architects, site planners, and developers that can produce residential developments which are in keeping with overall land use intensity and open space objectives of the Comprehensive Plan while departing from the strict application of use, setback, height, and minimum lot size requirements contained in the Zoning Code.

    Smith said that if the P&Z determine the application meets the requirements for an SPD they should set a public hearing of the Planning and Zoning Commission for February 4. P&Z has voted to set that date for a public hearing.

    The property currently has one single-family home on 1.1496 acres. The property is on Oak Street and wraps around the bend to Second Street. The Northwest side of the property has significant to extreme slopes according to the application.

    The existing single-family home could be demolished and replaced by 64 apartments on Oak Street. (Photo by David Miller/Loveland Magazine © 2020)

    In the application, Sabo Design said, “As proposed, the development would provide 64 new apartment residences with remarkable views and walkable to Downtown Loveland. Additionally, with the self-contained parking provided, there would be no additional burden to the Business District.”

    The application will be first reviewed by P&Z. If the Commission feels that the SPD, as proposed in the Preliminary Review, does not fall within the SPD purpose and scope the Planning and Zoning Commission may deny the application or suggest an alternative action.

    The Planning and Zoning Commission meets next on Jan 27 at 6 PM.

    “Right Clicking” on the below documents will open them to a larger size.