Tag: journalists

  • We thought that all this talk about us being the enemy of the people would be dismissed for the silliness that it is

    We thought that all this talk about us being the enemy of the people would be dismissed for the silliness that it is

    An Editorial

    We’ve been complacent

    David Miller is the Publisher of Loveland Magazine

    We thought everybody knew how important a free press was to our world and that all this talk about us being the enemy of the people would be dismissed for the silliness that it is.

    However, it took President Trump only 6-1/2 minutes into his one-hour long campaign speech last night in Warren County before launching into his familiar tirade about the “fake” news media. When his supporters began booing after he wagged a disapproving finger at the press cameras and reporters, he proudly grinned his supportive endorsement.

    But the reckless attacks have continued, instigated and encouraged by our president.

    The reckless attacks on the press have continued, instigated and encouraged by our president. 

    When the leader of the free world works to erode the public’s trust in the media, the potential for damage is enormous, both here and abroad. We once set an example of free and open government for the world to follow. Now those who seek to suppress the free flow of information are doing so with impunity.

    The time has come for us to stand up to this dangerous taunting. The role journalism plays in our free society is too crucial to allow this degradation to continue.

    We aren’t the enemy of the people. We are the people.

    We aren’t the enemy of the people. We are the people. We aren’t fake news. We are your news and we struggle night and day to get the facts right.

    On bitter cold January nights, we’re the people’s eyes and ears at City Hall and school board meetings. We tell the stories of our communities, from the fun of a street fair, our successful school children, to the despair a family faces when a loved one dies.

    We are always by your side. We shop the same stores, attend the same churches, and hike the same trails. We struggle with daycare, utility bills, and worry about paying for retirement. 

    In our work as journalists, our first loyalty is to you. Our work is guided by a set of principles that demand objectivity, independence, open-mindedness and, the pursuit of the truth. We make mistakes, we know. There’s nothing we hate more than errors but we acknowledge them, correct them and learn from them.

    Our work is a labor of love because we love our community.

    Our work is a labor of love because we love our community and believe we are playing a vital role in our democracy. Self-governance demands that our neighbors need to be well-informed and that’s what we’re here to do. We go beyond the government issued press release or briefing and ask tough questions. We hold people in power accountable for their actions. Some think we’re rude to question and challenge. We know it’s our obligation. We strive to always give the ordinary citizen the last word.

    People have been criticizing the press for generations. We are not perfect. But we’re striving every day to be a better version of ourselves than we were the day before.

    The problem has become so serious that newspapers across the nation are speaking out against these attacks in one voice this week on their editorial pages.

    That’s why we welcome criticism. But unwarranted attacks that undermine your trust in us cannot stand. The problem has become so serious that newspapers across the nation are speaking out against these attacks in one voice this week on their editorial pages.

    As women’s rights pioneer and investigative journalist Ida B. Wells wrote in 1892: “The people must know before they can act and there is no educator to compare with the press.”


    This Editorial has been adapted from an editorial by Judy Patrick, VP of Editorial Development for the New York Press Association that she releases to celebrate National Newspaper Week.


     

  • How a Proposed First Amendment Law Would Protect Survivors of Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault in Ohio

    How a Proposed First Amendment Law Would Protect Survivors of Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault in Ohio

    The Ohio Citizen Participation Act will help prevent frivolous lawsuits against all Ohioans

    Evan Mascagni is the Policy Director for the Public Participation Project

    by Evan Mascagni,

    Immediately following a report by the New York Times that he allegedly sexually assaulted numerous women throughout his career, Harvey Weinstein threatened to sue the Times for defamation. For First Amendment legal scholars, this comes as no surprise. There’s a long history of powerful bullies attempting to use the legal system to silence their critics.

    These types of lawsuits, most commonly called Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs), are used to silence and harass critics by forcing them to defend these baseless but costly suits. SLAPP filers don’t go to court to seek justice. Rather, SLAPPS are intended to intimidate the target by draining their financial resources and dragging them through years in the court system. 

    The Act will also help protect the domestic violence and sexual assault survivors who are afraid to speak out for fear of their abusers.

    Luckily for residents of Ohio, a new bill introduced by State Sen. Matt Huffman (R-Lima), would protect Ohioans from frivolous lawsuits that chill their First Amendment rights.  Senate Bill 206, The Ohio Citizen Participation Act, would allow Ohio to join 28 other states that have already enacted anti-SLAPP laws of their own, and put Ohio at the forefront of protecting free speech and petition activity.

    These retaliatory lawsuits can arise in many contexts.

    The Ohio Citizen Participation Act will not only protect journalists who are threatened for reporting on sexual harassment and assault allegations, as occurred with the Times’ Weinstein investigation. The Act will also help protect the domestic violence and sexual assault survivors who are afraid to speak out for fear of their abusers, who can use the courts as a weapon of retaliation. As Nancy Neylon, Executive Director of the Ohio Domestic Violence Network, pointed out, “court proceedings can provide a tool for abusers to exert and reestablish control over a domestic violence survivor long after the relationship has ended.”

    These retaliatory lawsuits can arise in many contexts, including suing survivors for defamation if a survivor reports the abusers to law enforcement or speaks out publicly about the abuse they have suffered. This turns our legal system on its head, as the very place to which a survivor turns for protection becomes a weapon used against them.

    Evan Mascagni is the Policy Director for the Public Participation Project, a non-profit organization working to strengthen the First Amendment rights of all Americans by enacting strong anti-SLAPP legislation at the state and federal level.


     

    The Ohio Citizen Participation Act will help prevent frivolous lawsuits against all Ohioans, including domestic violence and sexual assault survivors, and help ensure that bullies don’t use the legal system as a tool of intimidation and retaliation.   

    For these reasons, I applaud Sen. Huffman for introducing the Ohio Citizen Participation Act. I hope that it passes through the state legislature quickly and is signed by the governor.  


    WHAT IS A SLAPP?

    The rights to speech and petition are enshrined in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Free speech and healthy debate are vital to the well-being of a democracy. In fact, the United States Supreme Court has said that the right to petition the government is the very foundation of our democracy.

    SLAPP = Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation

    SLAPPs are Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation.  These damaging suits chill free speech and healthy debate by targeting those who communicate with their government or speak out on issues of public interest.

    SLAPPs are used to silence and harass critics by forcing them to spend money to defend these baseless suits.  SLAPP filers don’t go to court to seek justice.  Rather, SLAPPS are intended to intimidate those who disagree with them or their activities by draining the target’s financial resources.

    SLAPPs are effective because even a meritless lawsuit can take years and many thousands of dollars to defend.  To end or prevent a SLAPP, those who speak out on issues of public interest frequently agree to muzzle themselves, apologize, or “correct” statements.


    Learn how SLAPPs affect your area of interest.

    For recent news on SLAPPs.  

    SLAPP-related cases, legal articles, etc.

    Information about anti-SLAPP laws your state.


    Read More at the web site of The Public Participation Project