Tag: Stand Your Ground

  • Ohio Republicans push to waive training, permit requirements to carry concealed guns

    Ohio Republicans push to waive training, permit requirements to carry concealed guns

    BY: JAKE ZUCKERMAN and Ohio Capital Journal

    Both chambers of the Ohio General Assembly are plodding forward on legislation to waive training requirements to carry a concealed weapon.

    While current law allows state residents to openly carry a weapon, it only allows those 21-and-up to obtain a concealed carry permit after completing an 8-hour training course and passing a background check.

    House Bill 227 and Senate Bill 215, which contain some important differences, would waive these permitting requirements, including the training

    The effort, if successful, would continue Ohio’s steady relaxing of its gun laws over the last 20 years, which has included launching the concealed carry program in 2004 that required 12 hours of training; passing “pre-emption” legislation in 2006 which blocks cities from enacting gun laws stricter than those at the state level; and removing the duty to retreat (passing “stand your ground”) in 2020, which removed the requirement for a person to seek retreat before responding to a perceived attack with deadly force.

    On Thursday, the House Government Oversight Committee held its fourth hearing on the permitless concealed carry legislation.

    Over several hours, members of Moms Demand Action, an anti-gun violence advocacy group, made their case against the bill. They argued it will inevitably increase rates of gun violence. The Ohio Attorney General’s Office reports roughly 1,200 concealed carry applications are denied each year for reasons set in code, like criminal histories, civil or temporary protective orders, or others.

    What, they asked, will happen to those applicants if there’s no more licensing process?

    “It allows guns in the pockets of lowlifes,” said Sieglinde Martin, an MDA member.

    Micaela Deming, an attorney with the Ohio Domestic Violence Network, said domestic violence misdemeanor convictions and protective orders are the second highest reason that would-be gun owners fail background checks. Waiving the permitting requirements, she said, would mean the loss of a key screening mechanism to remove guns from these domestic offenders.

    Gun lobbyists and enthusiasts argued that the public safety threat is overblown. Law breaking gun possessors, they said, will continue to break laws regardless of how strict or lax they are. The bill is about enshrining Ohioans rights under the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

    “I don’t think there’s anything in the bill that says, ‘If you’re prohibited from carrying a [concealed] firearm, suddenly now you can’ — if you’re prohibited, you’re prohibited,” said Rep. Shane Wilkin, a cosponsor of the bill and committee chairman overseeing its hearings, in an interview.

    “Those that are going to carry that are not mindful of the law regardless of what it is, are going to carry regardless.”

    After the hearing, Wilkin said he didn’t know if the bill would be up for a vote at its next hearing but said he wouldn’t rule it out.

    Lawmakers on the committee were generally warm to the legislation. Rep. Phil Plummer, R-Butler Twp., said it’s “kind of bizarre” that it’s legal to openly carry a weapon in Ohio, but becomes illegal if you put on a jacket that covers it.

    Rep. Don Jones, R-Freeport, needled one witness who said states that legalized permitless concealed carry experienced higher levels of violent crime than those that did not. He asked whether that could be the effect of other legislation like legalizing marijuana for recreational use.

    The Senate Veterans and Public Safety Committee, meanwhile, has held two hearings on similar legislation from Sen. Terry Johnson, R-McDermott.

    A key difference from the House version: The Senate bill would also establish procedures for a pretrial immunity hearing for people facing criminal charges or a civil lawsuit related to their use of force in purported self-defense.

    The hearing, which would come before any trial, provides a substantial advantage to the accused: It would tell the court to assume the accused used force in self-defense and requires prosecutors (in a criminal case) to prove beyond a reasonable doubt or plaintiffs (in a civil lawsuit) to provide “substantial evidence” that the person did not use force in self-defense.

    If the prosecutor or plaintiff fails in this, the accused would be considered immune from the charge or lawsuit. If they succeed, the proceedings will then move toward a trial.

    Although bill proponents say otherwise, courts have generally held that licensing requirements to carry concealed weapons do not violate the Second Amendment.

    In a 2003 Ohio Supreme Court opinion (that preceded Ohio’s first concealed carry law), Justice Paul Pfeifer, writing for the majority, was blunt in a majority opinion.

    “(The law) does not unconstitutionally infringe the right to bear arms; there is no constitutional right to bear concealed weapons,” he wrote.

    In 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a major opinion, now seen as a Second Amendment landmark decision, overturning a Washington D.C. law that prohibited residents from owning a firearm in their homes. However, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, an icon in conservative legal and political circles, noted in his majority opinion that the right to bear arms isn’t infinite.

    “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited,” he wrote.

    “(There is no constitutional) right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”

    Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost is responsible by law to handle some of the administrative work in Ohio’s concealed carry program. In a statement, a spokesman said Yost has not yet taken a position on either bill and is actively monitoring them.

    “By any measure, Ohio’s concealed-carry licensing system has succeeded in combining safeguards that protect the public and provisions that uphold Americans’ right to bear arms and protect themselves,” he wrote in the 2020 annual report on the program.

    Twenty-one states allow inhabitants (residents only in North Dakota) to carry a concealed weapon without a permit, according to a count from the U.S Concealed Carry Association. This includes neighboring states of West Virginia and Kentucky.

  • DeWine asked for gun control. Lawmakers gave him a ‘make my day’ bill

    DeWine asked for gun control. Lawmakers gave him a ‘make my day’ bill

    By Jake Zuckerman and Ohio Capital Journal

    The Ohio Senate passed a “stand your ground” bill Friday, sending to Gov. Mike DeWine a proposal that would rescind a requirement that gun owners first seek to elude a confrontation before responding with bullets.

    If passed, Senate Bill 175 would hand a major victory to gun advocacy groups like the National Rifle Association and the Buckeye Firearms Association who have pushed the proposal for years.

    Conversely, passage comes as a loss for prosecutors, law enforcement associations, and anti-gun violence activists who testified against the bill.

    The legislation landing on DeWine’s desk marks a major legislative loss for the governor, who put his political muscle behind a comparatively modest gun control package after a mass shooting in 2019 in Dayton left nine dead and 27 injured.

    Legislative leadership never put DeWine’s bill up for a vote. However, they fast-tracked stand your ground, circumventing any committee vote and passing the bill through both the state House and Senate in the dying hours of the legislative session.

    Should DeWine sign SB 175, he would remove from state law the “duty to retreat” from a confrontation, which compels people with a reasonable belief of a threat to bodily harm to reasonably try to escape a showdown before engaging with force.

    In 2008, lawmakers removed the duty to retreat in a confrontation in one’s home or vehicle, a concept known as the “castle doctrine.” Senate Bill 175 would expand the castle doctrine to almost any place where a person is lawfully present.

    If a person does shoot someone else and claim self-defense, the legislation says a court cannot consider the possibility of retreat when assessing whether that person used force in self-defense.

    “It’s just a very simple thing to take out of the law that will help average citizens should they come into a situation where they have to defend themselves,” said Sen. Terry Johnson, R-McDermott.

    Democrats criticized the proposal, saying it foments a showdown culture by alleviating people of a reasonable requirement to try to defuse a situation before escalating it.

    They also said the bill will disproportionately harm Black people, who are more likely to be perceived as threats and less likely to be taken at their word should they mount a claim of self-defense.

    “Removing the duty to retreat leads to the unnecessary escalation of tense situations,” said Sen. Cecil Thomas, D-Cincinnati.

    A handful of Republicans joined Democrats in opposition, notably including the judiciary chairman, Sen. John Eklund, R-Munson Twp.

    He said it doesn’t make sense to limit what a jury can or can’t consider (i.e. whether a shooter could have retreated first).

    Sen. Peggy Lehner, R-Kettering, gave a floor speech against the bill, arguing it sends a dangerous signal to Ohioans.

    “The symbolism is, don’t think for one minute that we’re going to back off from our love of guns, or back off in any way that suggests there might be limits to the Second Amendment,” she said.

    Sen. Bill Coley, R-Liberty Twp., spoke in support of the bill, characterizing it as a logical extension of the right to bear arms.

    “We are clarifying the rules of how that right will be properly executed in this state,” he said.

    Following passage, all eyes are on DeWine.

    “Instead of dealing with the multiple crises facing Ohio, Republicans in the legislature are doing everything they can to make our state less safe,” said Michael McGovern, a spokesman with ProgressOhio, a liberal policy group.

    “Now we will find out if Gov. DeWine is serious about addressing gun violence in Ohio. If he does not veto this bill, he loses all moral authority on this issue.”

    The Ohio chapter of Moms Demand Action, a gun control group formed after the Sandy Hook school shooting in Newtown, Conn., said anything short of a veto from DeWine is an “abdication of duty.”

    “Ohioans have been crystal clear, we don’t want to live in a state with Stand Your Ground. Gov. DeWine, this is your chance to do something — veto Stand Your Ground,” said Lisa Voigt, a volunteer with the Ohio chapter. “Stand Your Ground is not only dangerous, it’s also unnecessary — Ohio self-defense law already protects people in imminent danger with no other option. Stand Your Ground is about protecting vigilantes and people who would rather shoot than walk away from an argument and would put more lives — especially Black lives — at further risk of gun violence.”

    Rob Sexton, a Buckeye Firearms Association spokesman, said his organization has been pushing for stand your ground for about a decade. As Ohio has broadened its gun rights during that period, he said the counter-arguments that the new policies will lead to a “wild west” type culture have never panned out.

    “When it comes to duty to retreat, we’re really talking about evening the playing field for the victim,” he said.

    Speaking to reporters last week, DeWine signaled a distaste for the bill but didn’t specify whether he would veto SB 175. A DeWine spokesman could not immediately be reached for comment.

    A DeWine veto would likely be the end of the line for the bill. There aren’t enough votes for an override in either chamber; the legislative session wraps up at year’s end at which point all unfinished legislation is dead; and DeWine has 10 days (not counting Sundays or holidays) after receiving the bill before he must act on it.

    Stand your ground laws first gained traction in the 1980s, then nicknamed “make my day” laws after the iconic line from Clint Eastwood in the “Dirty Harry” film series. Eastwood utters the phrase after thwarting a diner robbery in a gunfight.

    Since then, at least 25 states have passed such laws, according to a policy brief from the National Conference of State Legislatures.

    In 2018, the Ohio House and Senate voted to override Gov. John Kasich on a similar gun policy issue, amending the law to place the burden of disproving a self-defense claim on the prosecution.

    That same year, guns killed 1,555 Ohioans, according to data from the CDC.

  • URGENT: They’re rushing “Stand Your Ground” for a vote in Ohio

    URGENT: They’re rushing “Stand Your Ground” for a vote in Ohio

    by Sarah Mouncey

    Dear Loveland Magazine Readers,

    Over the weekend we were alerted that the Ohio House is planning to vote on an alarming gun bill as early as tomorrow.

    Sarah Mouncey is the Ohio Chapter Leader of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America

    Less than a week after a person armed with a gun shot and killed 12 people at a bar in California, our lawmakers are gearing up to make far-reaching changes to our state’s gun laws. And they’re trying to move quickly to force through this dangerous bill before the legislative session ends next month.

    Tell your lawmakers to REJECT HB 228, a bill that would threaten public safety by making Ohio a Stand Your Ground state. Send your message today.

    HB 228 would:

    • Upend centuries of self-defense law by making Ohio a Stand Your Ground state;
    • Make it easy for people, including some violent criminals, to carry hidden, loaded guns in public without a permit or safety training;
    • Allow out-of-state special interest groups to sue Ohio cities and towns for attempting to enact or enforce local solutions to gun violence.

    HB 228 is bad news for Ohioans. In just one click, send your lawmakers a message asking them to vote NO on HB 228 >>

    For months, volunteers like you and me have been writing, calling and making in-person visits to lawmakers to urge them to vote against HB 228, but pressure from the gun lobby is forcing this bill to come to a vote before the legislative session ends in just a few weeks.

    We need to get loud and we need to do it quickly.

    Thanks for all that you do.