Tag: taxpayer money

  • ‘Backpack Bill’ sponsors seek new school voucher funding formula

    ‘Backpack Bill’ sponsors seek new school voucher funding formula

    BY: SUSAN TEBBEN AND OHIO CAPITAL JOURNAL

    The sponsors of a bill that would promote the use of private school vouchers and “school choice” came together on Wednesday with a religious lobby group to bring the bill back up.

    House Bill 290 was originally introduced in May as a “legislative intent” bill aiming to allow students to have the funding they need “follow them” to private schools of their choice, should parents decide the public school system is not working for them.

    “We want to fund students, not systems, and empower parents to make the best decision for their children,” said bill cosponsor state Rep. Riordan McClain, R-Upper Sandusky.

    The bill came before passage of the new budget bill, which included the Fair School Funding plan, an overhaul of the public school funding model.

    Under the new budget, EdChoice private school vouchers, along with the EdChoice expansion, the Cleveland Scholarship Program, the Jon Peterson Special Needs Scholarship Program and the Autism Scholarship Program, are all directly funded by the state, rather than being deducted from monies distributed to public school districts.

    “Ohio parents and students overwhelmingly want quality local public schools. They don’t want the radical defunding of public schools that this bill would likely cause.”

    Melissa Cropper, president of the Ohio Federation of Teachers

    In the new language being added to the bill, if a family applies to be a part of the private school voucher program, sponsors say the taxpayer money the state would use to fund EdChoice or Cleveland scholarships would be put in individual educational savings accounts for the students use.

    The bill’s other cosponsor, state Rep. Marilyn John, R-Richland County, said the bill isn’t meant to discredit public education, but to allow student who learn differently to be able to have different options.

    “One size fits all doesn’t work,” John said. “It certainly doesn’t work for education.”

    McClain said they don’t have an estimate of how many students would be impacted by the so-called backpack bill, though they don’t expect to see a mass exodus of students headed to private schools, more of a gradual upward trend.

    “It’s something that, once we set the agenda for where we want the future of the state to be, the hope is that that network gets built up and those opportunities are created,” McClain said.

    Included in the press conference was religious advocacy and lobbying group Center for Christian Virtue, which backs the bill because of its focus on school choice and to make public school districts perhaps think twice about instituting what they see as controversial policies.

    Aaron Baer, president of the Center for Christian Virtue, said amidst debate in the General Assembly on critical race theory — which CCV has called “a racist ideological grandchild of Marxism that’s being taught in schools across the state” in a fundraising email in support of anti-CRT legislation — parents should be able to take the lead in their student’s education.

    Baer also brought up the Upper Arlington school district, which tried to implement some bathrooms at their schools that were gender neutral, before the city of Columbus said that was against city code. The school district had said students who used the gender-neutral bathrooms had been doing so without incident.

    “A bill like this would be able to say: Look, Upper Arlington, if this is what you want to do, if this is the policy you want to have, okay,” Baer said. “But now…those families are allowed to go elsewhere and maybe you’re going to think twice about doing something that parents don’t like.”

    The bill was already spurned by education associations and public school advocates when it was introduced, but the new language has done nothing to change minds.

    “Ohio parents and students overwhelmingly want quality local public schools,” said Melissa Cropper, president of the Ohio Federation of Teachers. “They don’t want the radical defunding of public schools that this bill would likely cause.”

    The backpack bill current sits in the House Finance Committee, but has not been scheduled for a hearing.

  • With drawing days away, Ohio legislation seeks to stop Vax-A-Million program

    With drawing days away, Ohio legislation seeks to stop Vax-A-Million program

    By Tyler Buchanan and Ohio Capital Journal

    Five Ohioans who have been vaccinated against COVID-19 are about to win $1 million through a new vaccine lottery program, but a Republican lawmaker wants to call the whole thing off.

    State Rep. Jena Powell, R-Arcanum, is drafting legislation that would prevent the state from administering any vaccine lottery program. 

    Hundreds of thousands of Ohioans have already signed up for the Vax-A-Million lottery, which will begin May 26 and include five weekly drawings of $1 million prizes. Participants must be at least 18 years old and have received at least their first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna or Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine.

    State Rep. Jena Powell, R-Arcanum

    There is a separate lottery program for those between the ages of 12 and 17, with the teenage winners receiving a full ride scholarship to any Ohio college or university. 

    The prize money will come from federal relief funds that have already been allocated to the Ohio Department of Health.

    There is some early evidence that vaccinations have ticked upward since that announcement, and two other states have now introduced their own version of a vaccine lottery.

    The Vax-A-Million program has received plenty of attention since Gov. Mike DeWine first announced the drawings last week. The reaction from Ohio lawmakers has been universally negative; legislators from both political parties have condemned the idea as an ill-conceived waste of taxpayer money.

    “As elected leaders, we’re obligated to take seriously our duty to be good stewards of taxpayer dollars,” House Minority Leader Emilia Strong Sykes, D-Akron, said in a recent statement. “Using millions of dollars in relief funds in a drawing is a grave misuse of money that could be going to respond to this ongoing crisis. Ohioans deserve better than this. I do hope people continue to get the vaccine and help our state reach herd immunity so our economy and way of life can thrive again.”

    State Rep. Haraz Ghanbari, R-Perrysburg, issued a statement calling for “additional accountability” from the Ohio General Assembly regarding the Vax-A-Million program.

    Bills normally require a 3-month waiting period until being enacted. Powell’s legislation includes an emergency clause for it to go into effect immediately in order to “prevent the COVID-19 vaccination lottery from taking place.”

    Along with prohibiting Vax-A-Million, Powell proposes to redirect the funding used for these drawings toward either children’s mental health initiatives or to small business relief grants.

    Gov. Mike DeWine is pictured during a statewide address on the pandemic. He announced a Vax-A-Million vaccine lottery in order to spur Ohioans to get their COVID-19 shots Photo courtesy the Ohio Channel.

    The Ohio Capital Journal left a message with Powell’s office seeking more information about the legislation, which has not yet been formally introduced. Given the normal timeframe of the legislative process, the likelihood of this halting the Vax-A-Million drawings appears to be a longshot.

    Powell has been among the harshest critics of DeWine’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, repeatedly characterizing his aggressive steps taken to prevent the virus from spreading as curbing Ohioans’ freedoms. She has blasted attempts to mitigate the pandemic, from masks to social distancing, and spent much of 2020 undercutting the state health department’s messaging — even as the virus raged in her native Darke County late last year.

    Powell represents Darke and Miami counties in the Ohio House of Representatives’ 80th District. Both counties lag behind the statewide vaccination rate.

    As of Friday, nearly 44% of Ohioans had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Just 29% of those in Darke County had received one along with 36% in Miami County, according to Ohio Department of Health (ODH) data.

    “Ohioans don’t want giveaways to mask (DeWine’s) horrible policy for the past year,” Powell wrote on Facebook, “they want freedom.”

  • I think the proposed millage of 16.78 for any levy is ABSURD!

    I think the proposed millage of 16.78 for any levy is ABSURD!

    by Mark Leguillon

    My name is Mark Leguillon and I live on McKinney Road. I’m a longtime resident of the community and a graduate of the Loveland School District. I believe most people in our community think that quality education is important.

    However, I think the proposed millage of 16.78 for any levy is ABSURD!

    If passed, this levy will put thousands of those residents on a fixed income in financial risk. This would also include many others who live paycheck to paycheck.

    Renters should also be concerned, if this levy passes it is almost a certainty that their landlords will pass the cost on to them.

    The average additional tax burden to the folks that made Loveland a great place to live is about 42% – this is in an additional amount to an existing tax burden. An actual example – a homeowner currently pays $2,099 in school tax alone. This proposed levy would add an additional $878. That is $2,977 which does not include county and other local taxes (And Symmes Township is already talking about the need to place 3 levies on the ballot next year. I don’t know if the City of Loveland has any levies planned.

    What other product or service can you name that has increased by 42%?

    I’m happy and proud that Loveland has achieved the “Excellence in Education” award and we should thank all the staff and students for achieving that award.

    I have a few questions that I hope the superintendent or the school board will respond to in writing and release the answers to all media outlets within 7 days. To stay transparent. These questions are?

      1. Is there a secret super-duper excellence award that this levy would insure it can obtain? (in other words, how would this levy drastically improve the education of the student?)
      2. How does spending $10-$12 Million dollars on astroturf of engineered athletic fields improve the education of the student? Is there a direct correlation between these types of fields and much higher grade point averages?
      3. Do I understand that the Board has spent $100,000 of our taxpayer money that is not refundable and has committed to about $7.8 Million Dollars for the rest of the Grailville property without the levy passing?

    (I see this as the extortion part of your plan….)

    I am just waiting for that official to stand up and say “WE WILL LOSE THE $100,000 IF WE DON’T MOVE FORWARD WITH THE PLAN.

      1. DOES THIS REMIND ANYONE OF THE STREETCAR IN CINCINNATI??

    So you really know how I feel!

    I’m angry and I see these actions as careless and Irresponsible.

    Now I’m going to give you one hypothetical:

    If the taxpayers could demand a 42% reduction to the entire school district budget how do you think that would be received by the school district? Especially if it was only for 37 years (that is what you’re asking from the taxpayers in reverse).

    I understand that the last levy passed was a 5.6 levy in 2014.

    If the buildings are in such bad shape and there is an overcrowding problem. I believe these and other problems rest clearly on your leadership or lack of.

    Since the past problems were not addressed – what circumstances would create a want so large as to do financial harm to our neighbors

    In ending I would like to talk about process and reality.

    I understand that we hired consultants. My opinion of consultants is they exist for 2 reasons.

      1. They tell you about existing problems you should already know about,
      2. AND THE BIG ONE

    THEY TELL YOU WHAT YOU WANT TO HEAR WHETHER YOU CAN AFFORD IT OR NOT!

    DID THEIR REPORT INCLUDE THE PART ABOUT THIS LEVY BANKRUPTING MANY OF OUR NEIGHBORS?

    IT DIDN’T CONCERN THEM THEY ARE CONSULTANTS –

    BUT IT SHOULD CONCERN YOU!


    [Video] Mark Leguillon addresses BOE on school levy

    Mark Leguillon spoke at the beginning of the meeting about the combined operating and bond levy of 16.78-mil that will be before voters on the November 5 ballot.


    If you find this story useful and helpful in your daily life…