Tag: U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown

  • University of Akron poll shows comfortable lead for Trump in Ohio, dead heat U.S. Senate race

    University of Akron poll shows comfortable lead for Trump in Ohio, dead heat U.S. Senate race

    Getty Images.

    The 2024 Buckeye Poll depicts sharp partisan divisions, but U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown continues to draw votes from Republicans

    By: Ohio Capital Journal

    A University of Akron Bliss Institute poll released Thursday found Donald Trump running ahead of Kamala Harris in Ohio by seven points, and U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown holding a slight advantage against his Republican challenger Bernie Moreno.

    The findings are part of the school’s 2024 Buckeye Poll conducted from Sept. 12 to Oct. 24. The survey included 1,241 registered voters with a margin of error of +/- 2.8 percentage points.

    Digging into the details, pollsters noted the wide gender gap many expect to see in the presidential contest nationally didn’t really show up at the state level. They even note Trump holds a nominal 1-point lead among women, although that’s well within the margin of error and 3% remain undecided.

    The poll found independents in Ohio lean toward Trump in the presidential race, but almost a quarter of that group is still undecided. In the Senate race a third of independents still hadn’t made up their mind.

    The survey also sheds light on stark divides in voters’ vision of the country. Partisans on both sides are far apart on issues like economic policy, immigration, abortion, and trans rights.

     U.S. Senator Sherrod Brown speaks to a supporter at a Democratic Party campaign event for Franklin County voters. (Photo by Graham Stokes for Ohio Capital Journal. Republish photo only with original article.) 

    Presidential race

    The Buckeye Poll found 51% of respondents support Donald Trump compared with 44% backing Kamala Harris. Those results include respondents leaning toward a particular candidate — 4% in Trump’s case and 6% for Harris, while another 5% of voters were backing a third party or remained undecided. Trump’s seven-point advantage is beyond the poll’s margin of error, and roughly in line with his actual performance in Ohio in 2016 and 2020, which he won by eight points each time.

    “We’re not surprised at all by the numbers in the presidential race showing Donald trump with a healthy lead over Harris at seven points,” Bliss Institute director and political scientist Cherie Stachan said.

    The poll also broke down respondents’ partisanship on a spectrum running from ‘strong’ to ‘lean’-ing for both parties with independents in the middle. Among voters who identified as independents, 39% are backing Trump as compared to 24% supporting Harris. Another 23% said they were backing neither.

     VANDALIA, OHIO – MARCH 16: Ohio Senate candidate Bernie Moreno greets former President Donald Trump in Vandalia earlier this year. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images) 

    U.S. Senate race

    Strachan described the contest between Brown and Moreno as a “margin of error race.” The Buckeye Poll’s topline result had Brown leading Moreno 46% to 44% — neck and neck given the poll’s margin for error.

    “The one thing that is interesting about the Senate race,” she said, “is that you do have, still, at least in this poll, enough people willing to split their ticket and support the incumbent senator for whatever reason to make it a margin of error race.”

    Based on the overlaps they saw in the poll, Brown earned about three points from respondents who support Trump, but nevertheless plan to vote for the Democratic senator.

    It’s notable, Strachan said, that “Trump’s endorsement has not pushed that challenger over the edge — Moreno has not solidified all of the Republicans despite the Trump endorsement.”

    That shows up a bit in the quality of their responses in the Senate race. Voters’ preferences were a bit squishier, with significantly more ‘lean’ voters than in the presidential race. Brown got strong support from 37% of respondents with another 9% leaning his way. But for Moreno, 30% of respondents said they’re strong supporters, and 14% said they’re only leaning his way.

    “I think that’s just another signal that he may have done some things that may have not been as successful in persuading people that he’s a good candidate,” Strachan said, “or that he’s a candidate that people feel comfortable supporting.”

    As an anecdotal example, she pointed to television ads. Although Moreno and outside groups supporting him have spent heavily attacking Brown, they’ve spent substantially less promoting Moreno — a relative newcomer politically. According to FEC data, independent groups have plowed more than $114 million into attacking Brown, but less than $66 million supporting Moreno.

    GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

    Polarization

    The Buckeye Poll found Republicans and Democrats sharply divided on several major policy issues. On abortion, immigration, and trans-rights the parties are mirror images of one another in terms of support or opposition.

    Strachan noted those cleavages have become so pronounced and widespread in recent years that political scientists describe the phenomenon as negative partisanship: “I dislike the other side more than maybe I like my own,” Strachan described. “The animosity toward the other side is driving us to stay in our partisan silos more than liking our own.”

    That’s part of what makes Brown’s continued appeal across party lines significant, even if that appeal has put him in a statistical tie.

    “In American politics writ large, it’s becoming increasingly harder to pull off what Brown is doing and getting those voters to split their ticket.”

    Follow OCJ Reporter Nick Evans on Twitter.


    Nick Evans
    Nick Evans

    Nick Evans has spent the past seven years reporting for NPR member stations in Florida and Ohio. He got his start in Tallahassee, covering issues like redistricting, same sex marriage and medical marijuana. Since arriving in Columbus in 2018, he has covered everything from city council to football. His work on Ohio politics and local policing have been featured numerous times on NPR.

    Ohio Capital Journal is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.

    MORE FROM AUTHOR

     

  • Ohio Democrats unify behind U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown amid uncertainty at the top of the ticket

    Ohio Democrats unify behind U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown amid uncertainty at the top of the ticket

    BY:  – Ohio Capital Journal

    In a couple weeks Kemba Live will host Taking Back Sunday in Columbus’ Arena District. But on Saturday morning, the concrete dance floor was lined with folding chairs and Democrats from around Ohio instead of elder millennials reliving past glories. The Ohio Democratic Party billed the gathering as a family reunion, pairing official business like selecting electoral college delegates with speeches from prominent party members like Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker and U.S. Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey.

    Although it wasn’t part of the original plan, the event also provided an opportunity to calm nerves amid uncertainty at the top of the Democratic ticket.

    “We know what we have to do,” Ohio Democratic Party Chair Liz Walters told the crowd. “We know that we can’t roll up our sleeves up and get to work if we don’t stop wringing our hands.”

    Since his debate performance, President Joe Biden has insisted he plans to stick around as the party’s nominee, and he’s participated in several public appearance to assuage doubts about his candidacy. His performance so far has been a mixed bag. At least one recent poll suggests the debate didn’t change the race.

    It leaves many in the party at sea — certain about the danger of their opponent, but uncertain about their nominee’s ability to beat him. As of Saturday morning, 19 U.S. Representatives and Senators had called on Biden to drop out of the race.

    As the event kicked off, party Vice Chair Andre Washington aimed to fire up the crowd. He acknowledged Biden had a bad debate.

    “Now, let’s talk about those 30-plus lies,” he said in reference to Donald Trump’s performance at the debate. “Let’s talk about the 2025 plan.”

    And he encouraged the crowd to make the case for the party at the water cooler.

    “When you talk about Sally wearing white shoes after Labor Day, talk about what Biden has done in four years. Talk about Sherrod Brown,” he shouted. “We came together and we kicked ass in August (2023) to protect democracy. It is not time for us put our foot on the brakes. It is time for us to put our foot on the gas.”

    Rank and file

    Perhaps unsurprisingly most attendees land somewhere close to Walters and Washington. Outside the venue, Jacqueline DuBose was wearing a floppy-brimmed hat covered in political buttons. She was eating lunch with Barbara Kaplan; both came down from Summit County.

    “I think his chances are — good,” DuBose said with a long pause. “I think he can win it — if we work.”

    She argued repeated discussions about Biden’s fitness distract from the work of convincing voters to back their candidates.

    “The bottom line we should be boots on the ground, making sure people are registered and making people understand how important this election is,” she said, “And we’ll win it and we’ll win it with a resounding victory — but we gotta work at it.”

    Kaplan admitted she has concerns, but argued much of the agita about Biden is coming from reporters rather than the average voter.

    “I do believe it’s a very close situation,” she continued. “And I think that Democrats, we’ll need to really work hard to get him elected.”

    Her husband Mike Kaplan offered a sharper assessment.

    “Unless the press decides that this topic has been fully discussed, then we need to have a new candidate,” he said, adding “The case needs to be made to the American people as to who is going to lead us for the next five years, and right now that’s not happening.”

    Kaplan is in his mid-70s and he’s a former mayor. He described deciding not to pursue reelection himself because he was no longer up for it, and argued neither of the major party candidates should be running.

    “I think he’s been a great president for what he has done,” Kaplan said of Biden, “But I think he now needs to make one more sacrifice.”

    Down the street, Joyce Skocic and Deborah Reidmiller from Mt. Vernon, were far more sanguine.

    Describing Biden, Skocic said, “He tells the truth, and he knows right from wrong. And by comparison, he doesn’t have to be perfect, but look what he’s running against.”

    “And I think a vote for Biden is a vote for Harris, too,” she added.

    Reidmilller expressed disappointment with Biden’s debate performance because it didn’t line up with her perception of his success in office.

    “He knows how to govern, he knows how to get legislation passed for the good of the people, so I am still with Biden-Harris,” she said. “And if Biden should need to step down at some point from the office, we’ve got Harris, and she’s awesome.”

    Meanwhile, Will Petrik and Deb Steele expressed serious doubts. Both of them serve as part of the Franklin County Democratic Party.

    Petrik said Biden is arguably the most successful president of his lifetime, but “as a candidate, I don’t believe that he has what it takes to beat Trump.”

    “I just think a lot of people watched (the debate) and lost faith in his ability to actually articulate a vision for the future,” he said.

    Steele worries about an enthusiasm gap with Biden at the top of the ticket.

    “I’m certainly going to vote for our Democratic candidate,” she said, “but I’m disheartened that Joe Biden isn’t seeing what we’re seeing.”

    Headliners

    As the day moved into speeches from U.S. Sen. Booker and Gov. Pritzker, the speakers touched on the complications in Biden’s candidacy lightly, or not at all. Pritzker acknowledged “there’s never been a more stressful time to be a Democrat,” and joked about a guided meditation concluding with taking an imagined sledgehammer to debate podiums.

    “There are folks in this room who are afraid. I feel that fear too,” Booker said vaguely, before turning to a litany of Donald Trump’s misdeeds. Pritzker called the former president a “uniquely awful man with evil intentions.”

    As the slate of speakers seemingly sidestepped the current president, they put greater emphasis on the importance of reelecting U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown. Booker argued it’s the only way Democrats have a chance at keeping control of the Senate.

    And there’s good reason to emphasize Brown’s race. Donald Trump won Ohio by about 8 points in the last two presidential elections. Polling in the current race is thin, but one survey suggests the former President has the advantage heading into November. Meanwhile, in Sherrod Brown’s last election, he bucked a red wave, and the same survey shows him polling ahead of Biden.

    Brown himself offered perhaps the most direct response to consternation about Biden’s candidacy.

    “Many of you heard me say the questions surrounding the president and his campaign are legitimate,” he said. “I’ve heard from many of you and from others. I’ll continue to listen to Ohioans because that’s my job.”

    “But here’s what I know,” he added, “I know that this drama cannot continue to overshadow our important work on the issues facing Ohio.”

    Follow OCJ Reporter Nick Evans on Twitter.


    Nick Evans
    NICK EVANS

    Nick Evans has spent the past seven years reporting for NPR member stations in Florida and Ohio. He got his start in Tallahassee, covering issues like redistricting, same sex marriage and medical marijuana. Since arriving in Columbus in 2018, he has covered everything from city council to football. His work on Ohio politics and local policing have been featured numerous times on NPR.

    Ohio Capital Journal is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.

    MORE FROM AUTHOR

  • Moreno blasted rivals over scandal. Now he’s welcoming a big player’s support

    Moreno blasted rivals over scandal. Now he’s welcoming a big player’s support

    (From left) Sec. of State Frank LaRose, Bernie Moreno, and state Sen. Matt Dolan, R-Chagrin Falls, on the debate stage before the March primary. (Debate pool photo courtesy of WCMH-TV.)

    BY:  U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown

    During the GOP U.S. Senate primary, Cleveland businessman Bernie Moreno went after his opponents over their connections to the biggest bribery and money-laundering scandal in Ohio history.

    But now he’s welcoming the support of a man who brokered what was perhaps the key relationship in a scheme in which Akron-based FirstEnergy paid $61 million to purchase a $1.3 billion bailout that fell on the backs of ratepayers — which is to say everyday Ohioans.

    The supporter, Cleveland businessman Tony George, invited a now-convicted lawmaker to travel on FirstEnergy’s private jet to Donald Trump’s 2017 inaugural, and booked the lawmaker and FirstEnergy executives into the same hotel for days of events during which federal prosecutors say the conspiracy began. George was still communicating with the central players in 2020, when the FBI started making arrests.

    When asked to comment on the seeming hypocrisy, Moreno’s campaign didn’t respond directly. It instead attacked his Democratic opponent, incumbent Sen. Sherrod Brown.

    Crooked bailout

    A political newcomer, Moreno in March sailed past his more-experienced opponents buoyed by the endorsement of former President Donald Trump.

    Moreno was once a harsh Trump critic, calling him a “lunatic” and a “maniac.” But as with Ohio Sen. — and vice-presidential hopeful — J.D. Vance, Moreno got into politics and turned into an ardent supporter of Trump, who is now a convicted felon.

    Moreno might have experienced a similar conversion when it comes to 2019’s corrupt bailout law, House Bill 6.

    In a Spectrum News 1 debate on Feb. 19, Moreno went after his Republican opponents, State Sen. Matt Dolan and Secretary of State Frank LaRose.

    Dolan in 2019 voted for HB 6, but then later said he supported a full repeal.

    LaRose, Ohio’s top elections official, provided “private” information to FirstEnergy CEO Chuck Jones during a brutal-but-successful war to stop a repeal of the bailout, according to text messages from Jones that were presented during a criminal trial last year. LaRose at first refused to comment on the messages. Then last July, he said he didn’t recall conversations with Jones and others involved in the scandal.

    As a result of the bailout conspiracy, former House Speaker Larry Householder, R-Glenford, last year received a 20-year prison sentence and former Ohio Republican Party Chairman Matt Borges was sentenced to five years. Jones and former FirstEnergy Vice President Michael Dowling were charged by state authorities earlier this year.

    About 19-and-a-half minutes into February’s GOP Senate debate, LaRose attacked Moreno over what LaRose said was Moreno’s support for government subsidies of wind and solar energy. Moreno swung back with HB 6, the corrupt bailout law.

    “I was against HB 6,” Moreno said. “These guys weren’t. They’re going to have to answer for their involvement in that scandal to a different audience than the one that’s here tonight.”

    Moreno took another swing at Dolan on April 30, when he took to X to say.

    @dolan4ohio was the most helpful member to pass the CROOKED and CORRUPT FirstEnergy Bailout Bill! Matt is a GUARDIAN for the Left Woke Mob and the Swamp but not the people of Ohio,” he said.

    Support from “Individual B”

    That last sentence was an apparent swipe at the Dolan family’s ownership of Cleveland’s baseball team. In 2021 it changed its name from the Indians to the Guardians in response to Native American protests — to the fury of some of its fans.

    But as for Moreno’s problems with figures who were involved in the bailout scandal, they appear to extend only to his political opponents — not his supporters.

    On May 16, his campaign held a Bourbon With Bernie fundraiser in Mentor. Cleveland businessman Tony George was a host, a privilege for which George paid $2,500.

    In addition to being a Moreno supporter, George has had a long and lucrative relationship with FirstEnergy. Entities linked to George received nearly $11 million from FirstEnergy over the years, according to a state audit.

    Unlike FirstEnergy’s two top executives, Gov. Mike DeWine’s nominee to the Public Utilities Commission, Householder, Borges and three others, George has not been charged in the conspiracy, and there’s been no public indication that state or federal authorities plan to.

    But George’s role was substantial enough that he was called “Individual B” in FirstEnergy’s deferred prosecution agreement — a document in which the utility copped to its culpability for the bribery scandal, along with paying out $230 million. It lays out Individual B’s close relationship with FirstEnergy’s top executive and to Householder from the fall of 2016, when Householder was plotting his return to the House and then to regain the speaker’s gavel.

    During his trial, Householder implausibly testified that during the 2016 World Series, he randomly wandered into the FirstEnergy luxury box at Cleveland’s Progressive Field. Raising doubts that his visit was just happenstance, the deferred prosecution agreement includes a message from Jones, the FirstEnergy CEO, to George on Nov. 5, 2016 — just three days after Game 7 of the World Series.

    “Pass on to (Householder),” Jones said. “When we were talking on (Wednesday) I told him there was gonna be a sense of urgency (for a bailout) but couldn’t tell him all the details. If we don’t move on some type of supplant (sic) in (the) first half of 2017 it will be too late. These (nuclear) plants will be shut, sold, or bankrupt. I don’t have any contact info for him.”

    George responded, “He’s more than ready to craft something,” federal prosecutors said in closing arguments in Householder’s trial.

    Expensive junket

    The following January, George invited Householder — and flew with him, Householder’s son and FirstEnergy Vice President Michael Dowling — on the FirstEnergy jet to the Trump inaugural. George also booked Householder and then-CEO Jones into the same DC hotel.

    What followed were days of swanky steak dinners and other events during which prosecutors said the bailout scheme was hatched.

    FirstEnergy’s deferred prosecution agreement, or DPA, says that George continued as a conduit between Householder and Jones until 2020, when Householder was arrested.

    Before the feds brought the hammer down, Jones, George and Householder were plotting to change the Ohio Constitution so Householder could continue as speaker for another 16 years. That would have allowed them to continue to increase electricity rates and use the resulting dark money to dominate Ohio government in ways not calculated to benefit ratepayers, or the public at large.

    The DPA includes messages between Jones and George on Feb. 28, 2020. Jones referred to Householder as “an expensive friend,” but said it would be valuable to keep him in his position of power because, as Householder said, he could “get a lot done in 16 years.”

    George agreed, saying, “Probably more than 5 previous Speakers combined.”

    Then, George added, “He will make Ohio great again.”

    Response

    The Moreno campaign this week declined to answer questions about these matters on the record.

    It was asked whether Moreno was aware of George’s involvement in the HB 6 affair when Moreno accepted George’s support. It was also asked if Moreno would return George’s money and decline support in the future.

    Communications Director Reagan McCarthy responded by asking in an email, “When is Sherrod Brown going to return the donations made to his campaign over the years including when FirstEnergy admitted it was bribing public officials?”

    In fact, Brown donated the $21,000 he’d received from FirstEnergy over the years to Ohio food banks within 10 days of Householder’s 2020 arrest, according to Federal Election Commission records provided by the Brown campaign.

    “While Bernie continues to actively fundraise with key players of the FirstEnergy bribery scandal, days after the FirstEnergy scandal was revealed, the Friends of Sherrod Brown campaign donated FirstEnergy contributions to local food banks across the state,” a spokesperson said in an email.


    Marty Schladen
    MARTY SCHLADEN

    Marty Schladen has been a reporter for decades, working in Indiana, Texas and other places before returning to his native Ohio to work at The Columbus Dispatch in 2017. He’s won state and national journalism awards for investigations into utility regulation, public corruption, the environment, prescription drug spending and other matters.

    Ohio Capital Journal is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.

    MORE FROM AUTHOR

  • Crack down on bank misbehavior after the March collapse of Signature and Silicon Valley banks

    Crack down on bank misbehavior after the March collapse of Signature and Silicon Valley banks

    Top executives from Signature and Silicon Valley banks would forfeit much of the compensation they received over the past two years under legislation U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown introduced Thursday with the top Republican on the Senate Banking Committee he chairs.

    Brown said the legislation he negotiated with South Carolina GOP Sen. Tim Scott combines the best aspects of other bills that his colleagues proposed to crack down on bank misbehavior after the March collapse of Signature and Silicon Valley banks. The pair excoriated the banks’ top executives last month at a banking committee hearing.

    Their proposal would allow the bank’s board or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to claw back executive compensation received in the 24 months prior to a bank’s failure as well as profits realized from selling the bank’s stock. It would exclude small community banks, and senior executives, or “white knights” that come to institutions in crisis.

    It also would strengthen banking agencies’ ability to remove or prohibit employment of senior executives who mismanaged risk, require bank bylaws to include governance and accountability standards, and increase the maximum civil penalty that regulators can assess on bad actors from $1 million to $3 million.

  • A weekend of protests in Columbus following Dobbs decision

    A weekend of protests in Columbus following Dobbs decision

    Protesters gathered at the statehouse to voice opposition to the Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade. (photo by Nick Evans)

    BY: NICK EVANS – Ohio Capital Journal

    Over the weekend protesters rallied in demonstrations large and small voicing their opposition to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v. Wade.

    The Attorney General

    Saturday afternoon a couple dozen people gathered near the end of a sleepy street in Beechwold. Demonstrators brought bullhorns, pots and pans, even a vuvuzela, and organizers handed out pamphlets describing what areas are and aren’t public property. Then they marched up a narrow side street to Attorney General Dave Yost’s home.

     Protesters demonstrating outside the home of Attorney General Dave Yost. (Photo by Nick Evans, OCJ.)

    “After his workday, he comes home, kicks his feet up, has real nice evening,” organizer Mandy Shunnarah-Reed told the group before they set out. “Meanwhile, the rest of us have to live with the consequences of the decisions he’s made about our bodies and our livelihoods, 24-7, 365. We don’t get to just not worry about it, because it’s not business hours.”

    “So that is why we are annoying him on a Saturday,” she said.

    The group grew to about 50 and they made a racket of chants, whistles and smashing cookware at the foot of Yost’s driveway while a security agent from the AG’s office looked on. The cacophony was short lived though — after about twenty minutes they learned Yost wasn’t home.

    Some Ohioans employed similar tactics to voice opposition to COVID-19 restrictions and to intimidate then-health director Amy Acton early in the pandemic. But Katie McKeel and her husband John were quick to draw a distinction.

    Katie carried a sign that read “my body, my rights, my vote, my voice will be heard in 2022.” But the “22” was taped on. She first made the sign in 2018 for the women’s march in Washington D.C.

    “If my right to my choice and my self-autonomy and what I do with my own body is not as important as the airspace of our elected officials, I find that to be completely out of whack,” Katie said.

    “We haven’t threatened Dave Yost. Amy Acton got death threats,” John chimed in. “That’s a big difference.”

    Christy Williams came to the protest with her daughter, and she argued that banning abortions won’t reduce the number that occur, it will just make them more dangerous. Like the McKeels, she believed their right to protest should take precedence.

    “This is a civil right,” she said. “You can do this.”

    The Statehouse

    Sunday morning thousands of people turned up at the Statehouse for a rally put on by the Ohio Democratic Party. Notably, although not surprisingly, many of the groups spanned generations. Mothers with daughters and even granddaughters showed up together waving handmade signs. Picking up on that, U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown noted up he was there with his wife, his daughters and grandkids. Brown told the crowd “we need a plan,” and argued for electing two new Democratic U.S. Senators and maintaining the Democratic majority in the House.

    “If we can carry out this plan, by this time next year the Senate and the House of Representatives will have codified Roe v. Wade,” Brown argued.

    The problem is, picking up Senate seats while keeping the House is a pretty tall order for a midterm election amid persistent inflation. The court’s decision to overturn Roe surely changes the political calculus, but it’s unclear how much.

    The other issue, as people like Nina Turner have pointed out, is that Democrats already have control of all the levers of power they need to codify abortion protections — they simply haven’t acted because some Democratic senators oppose ending the filibuster.

    Speaking afterward, Brown acknowledged some members of his caucus are “not in the right place” when it comes to the filibuster, but he insisted with two new members the party would act.

    “If we have two more Democrats, we will change the filibuster rules, so that a majority can speak,” Brown said. “All we’re asking for is majority rule.”

    One candidate looking to flip a Senate seat in Brown’s plan spoke to the crowd as well. Ohio Democratic U.S. Senate nominee Tim Ryan described the whiplash of marching to the Supreme Court building on Friday to protest with his 18-year-old daughter, in D.C. for an internship, alongside fellow congresswomen who were part of the fight that led to Roe in the first place.

    “This is a struggle,” Ryan said. “This is a struggle for this election, and the next election, and the next election in the decades to come because we’re gonna turn this around, and we’re gonna make sure that this never happens again.”

     Tim Ryan addressing the crowd outside the statehouse. (Photo by Nick Evans, OCJ.)

    Ryan acknowledged afterward that some voters might feel pessimistic in light of Democrats’ unwillingness to roll back the filibuster and take action to protect abortion access at the federal level. But he urged them not to check out.

    “So I would say you have a chance now,” Ryan said. “We are where we are. You have a chance to actually make that difference right here in Ohio.”

    While Ryan and Brown made the case for federal action, Democratic gubernatorial nominee Nan Whaley made a more immediate, explicit argument.

    “Ohio is ground zero for this fight,” Whaley insisted. “We are one of the largest states in the country where abortion is on the ballot.

    Whaley called Gov. Mike DeWine the “most anti-choice governor in the country” and chastised him for urging people to be civil in the wake of the decision. What’s civil about taking away rights, forcing women to maintain a pregnancy or risk dying on an operating table she asked.

    Like Brown and Ryan she drew a bright line from the court decision to the ballot box.

    “This is not a drill. This is not a hypothetical,” Whaley told the crowd. “Our lives and our children’s lives are on the line. I refuse to go back and I know I am not alone.”

  • BROWN HONORS LIFE OF SOUTHWEST OHIO CIVIL RIGHTS PIONEER, ELSIE STEWARD YOUNG, ON SENATE FLOOR

    BROWN HONORS LIFE OF SOUTHWEST OHIO CIVIL RIGHTS PIONEER, ELSIE STEWARD YOUNG, ON SENATE FLOOR

    In Case You Missed It: Last night, U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) honored the life and memory of Ohio civil rights champion, Elsie Steward Young, on the Senate floor.

    “Miss Elsie is a legend in Southwest Ohio. Her courage and her leadership made a difference for children not only in her community, but all over the country.” said Brown on the Senate floor. “Our thoughts are with her three surviving daughters and two surviving sons, her 36 grandchildren, and all her family and friends and loved ones. We know her legacy will live on, through both the lives of all the students whose education she made possible, and through the future generations of young people she inspires to stand against injustice, wherever they see it.”

    Brown’s full remarks, as prepared for delivery, can be found below.

    Last week, we lost an Ohio champion for civil rights, Miss Elsie Steward Young, of Highland County, Ohio, just after her 105th birthday.

    Miss Elsie is a legend in Southwest Ohio. Her courage and her leadership made a difference for children not only in her community, but all over the country.

    In 1954, after the Supreme Court issued its landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision and ordered an end to segregation in America’s schools, the two all-white primary schools in Hillsboro, Ohio refused to integrate.

    The district continued to send Black students to a single all-Black school, which was in shambles.

    I remember the stories my mother would tell me, of growing up in Mansfield, Georgia – she said she knew all about busing.

    They would bus the Black students past the newer, better-kept white schools, to the segregated Black schools that were falling apart.

    That’s what was going on in Hillsboro, Ohio.

    And Elsie Steward Young wouldn’t stand for it.

    Miss Elsie and a group of mothers took matters into their own hands, and became the Marching Mothers of Hillsboro.

    Every single day for two long years, they marched for miles to the town’s all-white primary school.

    Every day, they were sent home.

    But they carried on, and eventually, the community and the state and the country noticed. They joined with the NAACP to file a lawsuit against the Hillsboro Board of Education, which made it all the way to the Supreme Court – and they won.

    Because of Miss Elsie and her fellow mothers’ advocacy, the Court ordered the schools to integrate, and paved the way for integration in other northern cities.

    Her activism shows us what ordinary citizens can achieve, when they join together to fight for justice.

    It’s a reminder of how far we have come – and how much work we still have to do, to achieve justice and opportunity for ALL children in our country.

    Three years ago, Elsie Steward Young was inducted into the Ohio Civil Rights Hall of Fame. And that fall, we honored the Marching Mothers of Hillsboro and the children—now adults—who marched with our office’s Canary Award, at our annual Ohio Women’s Conference.

    Then-Senator Harris, now Vice President Harris, was supposed to speak, and we were going to present Miss Elsie with the award. But we both had to stay in Washington at the last minute, because of Supreme Court votes.

    So many Ohioans at the conference told me later that, frankly, I’m not sure I was missed that much – not with Miss Elsie there. She not only filled the void, she provided so much energy with her forceful, inspiring words.

    And that was at 102 years old.

    Throughout the conference, people were lining up to get pictures with her. When a video played, depicting the bravery and determination of the marchers, and when Miss Elsie spoke accepting the award, there was scarcely a dry eye in the audience.

    She talked about how she and the other mothers only did what any mother would have done for their children.

    So many Ohioans will miss Elsie Steward Young. Our thoughts are with her three surviving daughters and two surviving sons, her 36 grandchildren, and all her family and friends and loved ones.

    We know her legacy will live on, through both the lives of all the students whose education she made possible, and through the future generations of young people she inspires to stand against injustice, wherever they see it.

    I ask all my colleagues to join me in honoring Miss Elsie Steward Young – Ohioan, mother, determined champion for civil rights.

  • U.S. Senate passes coronavirus relief aid; bill now returns to the House

    U.S. Senate passes coronavirus relief aid; bill now returns to the House

    By Ariana Figueroa and Ohio Capital Journal

    Washington, DC – The U.S. Senate passed President Joe Biden’s nearly $2 trillion stimulus plan Saturday afternoon after wrangling over an amendment to trim unemployment benefits derailed the bill’s passage for nearly an entire day.

    Ohio Democratic U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown supported the bill while Ohio Republican U.S. Sen. Rob Portman voted against it.

    The Senate version, which does not include a federal minimum wage hike and puts limits on the funding for state and local governments, will now make its way to the House for review. Democrats are rushing to pass the relief package so it reaches the president’s desk before the March 14 deadline for unemployment benefits expire, in order to give states plenty of time to avoid missing those payments.

    No Republicans voted for the House bill last week. The bill passed the Senate along party lines, 50-49. A tie-breaking vote from Vice President Kamala Harris was not needed because Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) had to leave the Capitol after a family emergency.

    “This bill will deliver more help to more people than anything the federal government has done in decades,” Senate Majority Leader Sen. Charles Schumer said in a statement on passage of the bill.

    House Majority Leader Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said in a statement that the House would take up the bill on Tuesday.

    The Senate version of the relief package earmarks $10 billion of the $350 billion in aid to state, local governments, territories and tribes to go toward a state’s infrastructure projects such as improving broadband access. The Senate also set restrictions on how the money can be used, saying cities and states can’t use it to pay down pension costs or pay for new attempts to cut taxes.

    The bill would provide $130 billion toward helping schools reopen, $14 billion for vaccine distribution and billions more for childcare through a temporary expansion of the child tax credit. The bill also includes a narrower eligibility for individual stimulus checks of $1,400, where individuals making $80,000 and joint tax filers at $160,000 would be phased out.

    The Senate version provides for $300 weekly unemployment benefits — lower than the $400 a week in the House bill — through Sept. 6. It also makes the first $10,200 of unemployment insurance nontaxable for households with incomes under $150,000.

    It was the unemployment benefits package that stalled the Senate on Friday. More than 400 amendments were introduced to the Senate version of the bill, but as lawmakers were preparing to vote on the first — Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-Vt.) proposal to increase the federal minimum wage — Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WVa.) raised objections to an unemployment amendment.

    Sen. Tom Carper (D- Del.) had offered an amendment that kept federal unemployment benefits at the current $300 a week but extended the benefits through October, and made the first $10,200 nontaxable.

    A competing amendment from Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) also kept benefits to $300 a week, but also cut off the extension in mid-July.

    Both sides were attempting to win over Manchin, a moderate Democrat and a crucial swing vote in the 50-50 Senate.

    Democrats struck a deal with Manchin after a nine-hour impasse, and passed the amendment 50-49 around 1:30 a.m. Saturday.

    “The President has made it clear we will have enough vaccines for every American by the end of May and I am confident the economic recovery will follow,” Manchin said in a statement.

    “The President supports the compromise agreement, and is grateful to all the Senators who worked so hard to reach this outcome,” White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said in a statement after the deal. “It extends supplemental unemployment benefit into September, and helps the vast majority of unemployment insurance recipients avoid unanticipated tax bills.”

    Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.) told reporters on Capitol Hill Friday that it was  unclear what the House will do.

    “Will the House take it? I don’t have the answer to that,” he said.

    Progressives in the House are already expressing disappointment that the Senate reduced unemployment benefits and stripped out a raise of the federal minimum wage.

    “I’m frankly disgusted with some of my colleagues and question whether I can support this bill,” Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.) wrote in a tweet.

    Sanders’ amendment to increase the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour over a five-year period was defeated 42 to 58. The House included the wage hike in its version even after the Senate parliamentarian ruled that including the provision violated procedural rules, which are being used to approve the stimulus package with a simple majority of 51 votes instead of the 60 typically required by the Senate filibuster.

    The current federal minimum wage is $7.25 an hour, for an annual salary of about $15,000, and has not been raised since 2007.

    “The result of that is half of our people are now living paycheck to paycheck and many in fact are working for wages that are much too low in order to take care of their families,” Sanders said.

    Experts and researchers predict that a gradual increase in the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour would help lift nearly a million people out of poverty and benefit low-income workers across the country, particularly in the South.

    Debate over the relief package was also delayed on Thursday by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) who required Senate clerks to read aloud the 628-page bill — a procedure that senators typically waive. Senate clerks started reading the bill Thursday at 3:20 p.m. and finished early Friday morning at 2:04 a.m.

    Johnson told reporters on Capitol Hill Thursday that he planned to have members of his party submit hundreds of amendments to prevent Democrats from rushing to pass the bill in the hopes of wearing them down in order to trim the $1.9 trillion package.

    “All I’m trying to do is make a more deliberative process on this abusive and obscene amount of money,” he said Thursday.

    GOP Senators filed more than 400 amendments. Of those amendments, only three were adopted into the bill. Democrats introduced eight amendments, of which five were passed.

  • How Trump could quickly be removed from office using the 25th Amendment

    How Trump could quickly be removed from office using the 25th Amendment

    By Laura Olson and Ohio Capital Journal

    A rapidly rising number of federal lawmakers are calling for President Donald Trump to be removed from office, either through a process outlined in the 25th Amendment or through impeachment.

    Democratic Ohio U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown Thursday called for invocation of the 25th Amendment to hold the president accountable for Wednesday’s riots.

    “The cabinet and vice president should immediately invoke the 25th Amendment to remove him from office, to prevent him from doing more damage between now and Inauguration Day,” Brown said in a statement.

    The Democratic leaders of the U.S. House and Senate gave their support to calls for his removal that began Wednesday, after Trump incited the crowd of supporters that swiftly became a violent, destructive mob that ransacked the Capitol.

    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Thursday condemned Trump as having “committed an unspeakable assault on our nation,” and said that if the vice president and Cabinet officials do not seek to remove Trump, that Congress may begin another impeachment process.

    “That is the overwhelming sentiment of my caucus,” Pelosi said, calling it an “emergency of the highest magnitude.”

    Amid those mounting pressures for his removal, Trump released a video Thursday, finally acknowledging that “a new administration” will begin later this month and that he would focus on “ensuring a smooth, orderly, and seamless transition of power.”

    He did not acknowledge any responsibility for the riot, and told his supporters: “Our incredible journey is only just beginning.”

    Trump’s tenure is set to end in a matter of days, when President-elect Joe Biden is sworn in on Jan. 20. It’s not clear if House Democrats would be able to act before then to carry out articles of impeachment, but in theory, invoking the 25th Amendment could be done quickly.

    Seventeen Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee signed a letter urging Vice President Mike Pence to invoke the 25th Amendment. That group included Reps. Jamie Raskin of Maryland; Steve Cohen of Tennessee; Ted Deutch of Florida; Joe Neguse of Colorado; Mary Gay Scanlon and Madeleine Dean of Pennsylvania; Greg Stanton of Arizona; Cori Bush of Missouri; and Hank Johnson and Lucy McBath of Georgia.

    Here’s more on what the 25th Amendment says, and when it has been used before:

    Why was the 25th Amendment added?

    The 25th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was approved in 1967, in the wake of President John F. Kennedy’s assassination. It was intended to clarify succession procedures in the event that the president dies, is removed from office, or is “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.”

    What exactly does the amendment say?

    It makes clear that the vice president becomes president if the president dies, resigns or is removed from office, and that a new vice president must be nominated.

    There’s also a section on temporarily transferring presidential authority to the vice president, intended for scenarios like the president undergoing anesthesia for surgery.

    A final section provides for transferring presidential power if the president is unable to fulfill his constitutional role but he or she cannot or will not step aside. That provision requires approval from the vice president and a majority of either the Cabinet or another body that Congress may designate. Congress has never created such a commission, though Raskin introduced legislation to do so.

    The number of Cabinet officials who could be involved in such a discussion shrunk by one Thursday, when Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao — who is married to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) — resigned.

    When has the 25th Amendment been used? 

    President Ronald Reagan invoked it once, and President George W. Bush did twice when the men underwent medical procedures. They transferred authority to their vice presidents for a matter of hours, according to the National Constitution Center.

    What about impeachment?

    Trump already was impeached by the House in December 2019 on charges of abusing his power and obstructing Congress. The Senate acquitted him of those charges in February 2020.

    That process is legally complex and typically unfolds over a matter of weeks or months. And Pelosi declined on Thursday to offer a timeline on what comes next. If Trump were to be impeached and found guilty, it would prevent him from being eligible for public office in the future.

    Who has signed on to the efforts to remove Trump from office?

    A tally from CNN shows more than 30 congressional Democrats in support of removing Trump through the 25th Amendment or impeachment.

    Some Republicans have joined. U.S. Rep. Adam Kinzinger, (R-Ill.), has called for Trump’s removal. Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, another Republican, told reporters Thursday that the country “would be better off” if Trump resigned or was removed.

    Even the president of the National Association of Manufacturers has urged Pence to invoke the 25th Amendment.

    Biden declined to address calls to invoke the 25th Amendment on Thursday, instead blaming the president for inciting a mob, and labeling the rioters as “domestic terrorists.”

  • Sherrod Brown: Trick after trick to pay people less

    Sherrod Brown: Trick after trick to pay people less

    “If even a global pandemic will not get corporations to rethink their exploitative business model, it’s time to stop letting them run the economy.”

    By: U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown

    In the early months of this pandemic, as businesses and feel-good news stories hailed America’s workers as the heroes of our time, I published an open letter to America’s corporate leaders, imploring them to live up to their ad campaigns and invest in the workers who make their businesses successful. I wrote: If you truly believe that workers are essential to your companies, then treat them that way.

    All that has changed are that corporate profits have gone up.

    Since then, CEOs have not been beating down my door to discuss renewed efforts to invest in their workers. It has been six months, and all that has changed are that corporate profits have gone up, hazard pay has disappeared, and more workers have died. Since the pandemic started, hundreds of thousands of American workers have died of COVID-19 after contracting the virus on the job.

    Even as small businesses have shuttered in communities all over the country, profits for the largest retail companies have soared during the pandemic. Workers’ pay, predictably, has not. The Brookings Institution studied the 13 biggest retailers in the country and found that their earnings have shot up 39% compared with last year, and stock prices are up 33%. But wages have only gone up by about $1 an hour. 

    Trick after trick to pay people less 

    Amazon’s quarterly profits increased by close to a staggering 200%. Yet it rolled back its still-meager $2-per-hour raise in June, and announced a one-time bonus of just $300 per worker. Yes, you read that correctly — not $3,000, but $300, from a company that brought in $280 billion in revenue last year. 

    The company also has no plans to change its broader business model built on exploiting workers, largely workers of color and women, and busting unions. Amazon makes ample use of contractors, including what it calls “Amazon Flex” drivers — and as with other “gig economy” jobs, “flex” is just corporate PR speak for denying workers their rights as employees. 

    Of course Amazon is far from alone in its treatment of workers, nor is this problem new. For decades, corporations have used trick after trick to pay workers less and deny them health careretirement savingspaid leave and basic job security. We’ve seen the results of this corporate business model that treats workers as expendable: Profits go upCEO pay soars, and stock buybacks explode. And the middle class shrinks. 

    Profits go up, CEO pay soars, and stock buybacks explode. And the middle class shrinks.

    If even a global pandemic, where America’s workers have been on the front lines, will not get corporations to rethink their exploitative business model, it’s time to stop letting them run the economy. They had their chance. They failed. If corporate America won’t deliver for its workers, then government and unions must.

    In this presidential election, American voters made it clear they’ve had enough of the current system, where Wall Street runs the show. Joe Biden ran a campaign appealing directly to what he called the backbone of our country: hardworking people who get their money from a paycheck, not the stock market. And he won a commanding victory — over 81 million Americans gave him a 7-million-vote margin, more votes than any other presidential candidate in U.S. history, and a mandate for change. 

    It’s time for us to deliver results.

    An economy that reflects our values

    We can’t go back to business as usual before the pandemic, when it wasn’t working for a whole lot of people. If we are to build back better, we must create a new system centered on the dignity of work.

    In my open letter in June, I laid out actions corporations could take on their own, like raising base pay to $15 an hour. Since many of them refuse, we must raise the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour. Workers are still not safe on the job, so President-elect Biden must immediately issue an OSHA Emergency Temporary Standard forcing corporations to protect their workers from contracting or spreading the virus in the workplace and strengthen overall enforcement, so workers don’t have to worry about getting injured or becoming ill just for doing their job. 

    Many companies still deny their employees paid sick days, even during a pandemic.

    Many companies still deny their employees paid sick days, even during a pandemic, so we must pass a national paid family leave plan. Corporations are expanding rather than ending the exploitative “independent contractor” business model, so we must use the law to make them treat their workers as the true employees that they are. Corporations continue to coerce workers out of forming unions, so we must pass the PRO Act to guarantee workers a voice in their workplace.

    We can deliver on every measure of economic security I outlined in June, with or without corporate CEOs’ blessing. The economy isn’t physics — it’s not governed by scientific laws outside our control. It’s made up of people making choices about our values and what kind of society we want to live in.

    We have the power to change how the economy works, so it rewards work instead of greed. We can create more jobs at middle class wages. We can give people power over their lives and schedules. We can expand economic security and opportunity for everyone. Americans voted for this change, and we will not wait for corporations to reform themselves on their own. They never have. They never will. It’s up to the rest of us create a country where all work has dignity.

  • [VIDEO] Brown condemns GOP-led Justice Act as ‘CHECK IN THE BOX’

    [VIDEO] Brown condemns GOP-led Justice Act as ‘CHECK IN THE BOX’

    Washington, D.C. – Wednesday, U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) continued pushing for what he calls “meaningful police reform” as he voted against proceeding to debate the GOP-led Justice Act, legislation that he called a “check in the box” and would do very little to reform policing.

    Brown took to the Senate floor to call for passage instead the Justice in Policing Act, what he says is a “Comprehensive package.” He helped introduced the bill earlier this month, “To put important policing reforms into place, help end racial profiling in the criminal justice system and work to improve police-community relations.”

    “I’m not willing to stand here and participate in a political charade – to vote on something that won’t lead to real change, just to check a box and provide politicians with a talking point. It’s an insult to Black families who have been fed empty promise after empty promise for generations,” said Brown. “The Justice in Policing Act would create real change in our justice system, and communities across the country can’t afford us to not act on this meaningful legislation. We need to listen to the Black voices leading these calls for justice, and take real action.”

    Democrats on Wednesday denied Republicans the votes needed to pass the Senate GOP’s policing reform bill and send it to the House. Sixty votes were needed. The vote was 55-45.

    Ohio Senator Rob Portman (Provided by Portman office)

    Senator Rob Portman (R-OH), a co-sponsor of the Justice act released a statement saying, “The fact that Senate Democrats voted to block debate and an open amendment process on meaningful police reforms is outrageous and unacceptable. Over the last month we’ve continued to see egregious examples of injustice and violence against people of color. Americans want to see progress on meaningful police reform.”

    Brown says the Justice in Policing Act which he supports would:

    • Ban chokeholds, carotid holds, and no-knock warrants at the federal level and limits the transfer of military-grade equipment to state and local law enforcement.
    • Establish a National Police Misconduct Registry to prevent problematic officers who are fired or leave an agency from moving to another jurisdiction without any accountability.
    • Mandate the use of dashboard cameras and body cameras for federal officers and requires state and local law enforcement to use existing federal funds to ensure the use of police body cameras.
    • Create law enforcement development and training programs to develop best practices and requires the creation of law enforcement accreditation standard recommendations based on President Obama’s Task force on 21st Century policing.
    • Make important legal reforms to increase police accountability and transparency.

    The package also includes Brown’s End Racial and Religious Profiling Act, which hs said would better enforce equal protection laws and work to end racial profiling in the criminal justice system.

    Brown took to the Senate floor earlier this month, condemning what he characterized as President Trump’s “violent response” to protests of the murders of Breonna Taylor, George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, and countless other victims of racist police brutality and systemic injustice. Brown pointed out that Black and Brown communities have been and remain marginalized and targeted and that protests sweeping Ohio and the nation are calling for an end to systemic racism.

    Portman’s statement also said, “The JUSTICE Act takes responsible steps toward improving the collection of data on violence by and against law enforcement, providing funding to increase the use of body cameras, and increasing transparency and accountability while strengthening and reforming police training methods and hiring practices.  I hope my Democratic colleagues will reconsider their decision and join us in working towards real reform on this issue.”

    Brown’s remarks on the Senate Floor, as prepared for delivery, are below:

    Thousands of Americans are peacefully protesting in communities all across the country, demanding our country do better.

    The protests are an expression of grief, for Breonna Taylor and George Floyd and Ahmaud Arbery and Rayshard Brooks and so many other Black Americans murdered by the people who were supposed to protect them.

    They’re an expression of frustration and anger, that it’s 2020 – a century and a half after the official end of slavery, 55 years after the passage of the Civil Rights Act – and still Black people are fighting the same fight.

    And they’re also an expression of hope and patriotism. Demanding our country do better, demanding we live up to our founding ideals is one of the most patriotic things anyone can do.

    We need to listen to the Black voices leading these calls for justice, and take real action.

    That’s what Democrats want to do. My colleagues Senator Harris and Senator Booker in the Senate, and the CBC in the House, have led our bicameral efforts, and have a serious plan: the Justice in Policing Act.

    It would implement real, meaningful reforms and actually hold police accountable. It makes it clear:

    No more chokeholds. No more unchecked police misconduct. No more militarization of police misconduct.

    Of course we know this isn’t the only thing we need to do – policing didn’t create institutional racism, it’s a product of it and often reinforces it, and we have a lot of work to do beyond this. But these reforms are an important start to making policing in our country more just.

    The Justice in Policing Act would create real change in our justice system, and communities across the country can’t afford us to not act on this meaningful legislation.

    What we cannot do, is pass something called “Police Reform” that does very little to actually reform policing – and then turn around and tell Black mothers and fathers whose children have been slain, “we solved it, our work here is done.”

    I respect Senator Scott and I appreciate him coming to the table, and taking on this issue. I know he is fighting an uphill battle within his own caucus.

    I want to work with him, and with anyone of either party on real solutions.

    But I’m not willing to stand here and participate in a political charade – to vote on something that won’t lead to real change, just to check a box and provide politicians with a talking point.

    It’s an insult to Black families  who have been fed empty promise after empty promise for generations.

    We need to listen to the communities that suffer the most at the hands of police violence, and they all agree: the Senate Republican bill is simply not serious.

    It won’t fix the problems, and we’ll be right back here, sooner rather than later.

    Major civil rights groups all oppose this bill – the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, the Urban Leagues, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights.

    It doesn’t ban no-knock warrants. The Justice in Policing Act does.

    It doesn’t stop the militarization of police departments. The Justice in Policing Act does.

    It doesn’t create a national misconduct registry. The Justice in Policing Act does.

    It doesn’t ban chokeholds. The Justice in Policing Act does.

    These are all steps that civil rights groups have said are critical to any reform effort. This is the bare minimum we should be doing.

    Really all this bill offers is more studies of questions we already know the answers to.

    We don’t need more studies, more task forces, more delaying tactics.

    We need real accountability.

    The Justice Act could even put us in danger of moving in the opposite direction, by providing more funding for policing without adequate strings attached and without a similar investment in community supports.

    The NAACP says this bill, quote, “ignores the public demands to reimagine public safety by shrinking the purview of law enforcement and providing better funding to agencies equipped to address the critical needs of communities such as social services, mental health services, and education.”

    The Urban League says this bill, “dances around the edges in a show of political posturing.”

    We refuse to engage in that political posturing.

    We refuse to act like this is just a box we can check, so we can move on.

    We refuse to insult Black Americans by pretending this is a serious effort.

    People have suffered too long for that.

    We have been here before. This isn’t the first wave of protests, or the second.

    In 2014, after the murders of Tamir Rice in my city, in Cleveland, and Michael Brown in Ferguson, President Obama and his administration laid important groundwork for reform.

    They studied what reforms would be most effective, they instituted consent decrees with cities to hold departments accountable, and they created a roadmap we could follow.

    But President Trump undid much of the progress the Obama Administration made.

    The Urban League put out a plan for reform in 2014, after Michael Brown’s murder.

    Since then, nearly 1,300 Black men and women have been fatally shot by police.

    This bill does nothing to stop the practices that killed them.

    Black Americans know their lives are put in danger by policing every day. Let’s listen to them. People all around the country – Black and white and brown, in small towns and big cities, young and old – are all listening, waking up, and joining the calls for change.

    Let’s follow their lead. Let’s actually hear the voices that have been silenced for too long.

    I urge my colleagues to vote “no,” and instead work with us on real, meaningful reform to transform our public safety system into one that actually keeps people safe.