Tag: education

  • Little Miami’s William Zegarski sets State Cross Country record

    Little Miami’s William Zegarski sets State Cross Country record

    by David Miller

    Obetz, Ohio – Little Miami High School Senior William Zegarski set a new State record Saturday to win the Men’s Ohio High School Athletic Association Division I Championship. He ran the 5K course in 14:39.9 by a wide margin over second-place finisher Connor Ackley from Hillard Davidson 14:58.1.

  • Jessie Gibbins leads her Tigers to Runner-up at State XC Championship

    Jessie Gibbins leads her Tigers to Runner-up at State XC Championship

    Obetz, Ohio – Loveland High School Senior Jessie Gibbins led her Women’s Cross Country Team to the Ohio High School Athletic Association Division I Championship’s runner-up trophy Saturday. She was the 12th fastest woman in Ohio today. Gibbons is in the photo hoisting the trophy skyward – that her teammates will all be showing off at the high school Monday. Gibbins finished with a time of 18:25.2.

    The Men’s team Team placed 12th overall and was led by Senior Ryan Chevalier (15:37.3) who was the 14th fastest on the course today.

    Stay tuned to Loveland Magazine. We will publish individual times and our complete photo coverage soon.

    Ryan Chevalier receives his State Tournament medal

  • LHS send-off Cross Country teams to State Championship

    LHS send-off Cross Country teams to State Championship

    by David Miller

    Loveland, Ohio – The Women’s and Men’s Loveland High School Cross Country Teams got an electrifying send-off on Friday as they left town heading to the Village of Obetz. They compete at the Fortress Obetz sports complex Saturday afternoon in the OHSAA Championship. Go HERE to read tournament info from the Ohio High Schoo Athletic Association.

    It’s not too late to make plans to make the trip to cheer on our Tigers.

    Read this story we published yesterday and watch the interview Cassie Mattia conducted with the teams.

    LHS Men’s and Women’s Cross Country Teams go Down in School…

    Cassie Mattia –  Nov 4, 2021

    Here are some photos the Athletic Department published today of the teams on their Twitter feed.

  • Loveland School Covid 19 Dashboard for October 31, 2021

    Loveland School Covid 19 Dashboard for October 31, 2021

    Loveland, Ohio – At the beginning of each week, the Loveland City School District releases their latest Covid 19 Dashboard.

    Note the correction to the 10/3/ report and that community cases increased from 51 to 62.

  • Loveland area 2021 General Election Results

    Loveland area 2021 General Election Results

    Unofficial results from Clermont, Hamilton, and Warren Counties as of 11:30 PM, October 2, 2021 (100 percent of precincts reporting)


    Loveland City Council

    Candidates for Loveland City Council (4 to be elected to a 4-year term)

    Tim Butler

    Clermont County – 380

    Hamilton County – 1074

    Warren County – 180

    TOTAL – 1634

    John Hart

    Clermont County – 311

    Hamilton County – 987

    Warren County – 50

    TOTAL1348

    Kim Lukens

    Clermont County – 177

    Hamilton County – 508

    Warren County – 122

    TOTAL807

    Neal Oury

    Clermont County – 302

    Hamilton County – 852

    Warren County – 43

    TOTAL1197

    Ted Phelps

    Clermont County – 289

    Hamilton County – 902

    Warren County – 57

    TOTAL – 1248

    Kip Ping

    Clermont County – 295

    Hamilton County – 934

    Warren County – 51

    TOTAL1280

    Dave H. StantonWITHDRAWN

    Clermont County 91

    Hamilton County – Not Reported

    Warren County – 42

    TOTAL133


    Loveland City School District

    Member of Board of Education (3 to be elected to a 4-year term)

    Colette Boyko

    Clermont County – 1007

    Hamilton County – 1046

    Warren County – 28

    TOTAL2081

    Anna Bunker

    Clermont County – 480

    Hamilton County – 603

    Warren County – 18

    TOTAL1101

    Jonathan Eilert

    Clermont County – 1287

    Hamilton County – 1531

    Warren County – 33

    TOTAL2851

    Elliot Grossman

    Clermont County – 783

    Hamilton County – 919

    Warren County – 20

    TOTAL1722

    Al Juram

    Clermont County – 1075

    Hamilton County – 1059

    Warren County – 28

    TOTAL2162

    Elizabeth Mason

    Clermont County – 990

    Hamilton County – 1079

    Warren County – 32

    TOTAL – 2101

    Eric L. Schwetschenau

    Clermont County – 1290

    Hamilton County – 1307

    Warren County – 45

    TOTAL – 2642 √

    Eileen Washburn

    Clermont County – 1029

    Hamilton County – 1331

    Warren County – 30

    TOTAL2390


    Member of Board of Education (1 to be elected – Unexpired term ending 12-31-2023)

    Kevin M. Dougherty

    Clermont County 1740

    Hamilton County – 2022

    Warren County – 62

    TOTAL – 3824


    Symmes Township

    Township Trustee – 2 to be elected – 4 year term

    Ken Bryant – 1859
    CJ Carr – 1375
    Jodie L. Leis – 2135
    Kathleen M. Hofmann (Write-In) – 345


    Miami Township

     For Township Trustees Miami Township (2 to be Elected)

    Mark Schulte – 5,685
    Karl Schultz – 3,478
    Mary Wolff – 6,251


    Hamilton Township

    Hamilton Township Trustee (2 to be Elected)

    Darryl Cordrey – 2367

    Chris Gallagher – 1709

    Joe Rozzi – 2847


    Deerfield Township

    Deerfield Township Trustee (2 to be Elected)

    Carol Filomena – 2771

    Kristin Malhotra – 3464

    Julie Seitz -3033

    James V. Siciliano IV – 2827


    ISSUES

    Hamilton County – Tax Levy – Renewal & Increase – 4.51 ml 5yr – Children Services

    FOR – 79947

    AGAINST – 51289

    Great Parks of Hamilton County – Tax Levy (Additional) – 0.95 ml – 10yr – Parks & Recreation

    FOR – 71994

    AGAINST – 58857

    Warren County Mental Health Recovery Board

    FOR – 30956

    AGAINST – 10028

    Warren County Senior Services

    FOR – 32214

    AGAINST – 8917


    Board of Elections | Clermont County, Ohio

    Board of Elections of Hamilton County

    Board of Elections of Warren County

  • Shipments of COVID-19 shots for kids 5-11 on the way to states after FDA gives green light

    Shipments of COVID-19 shots for kids 5-11 on the way to states after FDA gives green light

    UPS employees move one of two shipping containers containing shipments of the Pfizer and BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine inside a sorting facility. (Photo by Michael Clevenger – Pool/Getty Images).

    BY: LAURA OLSON and Ohio Capital Journal

    WASHINGTON — Regulators at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Friday granted emergency authorization to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine for 5- to 11-year-olds, a step that means kid-sized doses can begin shipping to health care providers across the country.

    Vials of the two-shot vaccine will be headed to pediatricians’ offices, hospitals, pharmacies and other providers, so they can be deployed as soon as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention gives its sign off.

    The CDC’s panel of vaccine experts is scheduled to meet Tuesday to discuss guidelines for the vaccine’s use in the younger age group.

    Some 28 million U.S. kids are poised to become eligible for a COVID-19 vaccine, which would offer them significant protection against the disease that has disrupted three separate school years and so many other aspects of children’s lives.

    While kids have been at lower risk of infection and severe complications from the virus, the nearly 100 deaths among 5- to 11-year-olds mean it is one of the top 10 causes of death for that age group. Infections among children also have risen amid the summer surge from the delta variant.

    “As a mother and a physician, I know that parents, caregivers, school staff, and children have been waiting for today’s authorization,” acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock said in a news release announcing the shot’s authorization. “Vaccinating younger children against COVID-19 will bring us closer to returning to a sense of normalcy.”

    As with Pfizer’s shot for teens and adults, the version for children also requires two doses spaced three weeks apart. The dosage for the younger age group is much smaller: 10 micrograms for kids, compared to 30 micrograms for adults.

    Data from Pfizer that was analyzed by FDA regulators indicates that the company’s vaccine would offer strong protection. The two-shot regimen had a 90.7 percent efficacy rate in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 in a clinical trial of children ages 5 to 11, with similar side effects to those in adults, such as headache and fever.

    While millions of parents have been eagerly awaiting a vaccine option for their children, health care providers and public officials urging vaccination are likely to encounter greater hesitancy as COVID-19 shots become available to those under age 12.

    About 3 in 10 parents, or 27%, say they will vaccinate their 5-11 year old child “right away” once a vaccine is authorized for their age group, according to the latest tracking data from the Kaiser Family Foundation.

    One-third of parents say they will wait and see how the vaccine is working before seeking an appointment for their child, while another 3 in 10 say they definitely won’t get their 5- to 11-year-old inoculated against COVID-19.

    The most common concerns cited by parents in that KFF survey were related to safety: More than seven in 10 said they were concerned about the long-term effects of such a new vaccine, or that their child may experience severe, short-term side effects from the shot.

    The Biden administration’s COVID-19 advisers say they will be launching a comprehensive effort to encourage vaccinations in the new age group, with a paid media campaign and a network of trusted local leaders who they hope will be able to sway skeptics.

    “We will be ready to answer questions and build confidence through local efforts and national efforts,” said Jeff Zients, White House coronavirus response coordinator. “The bottom line is, we expect more and more kids to get vaccinated across time.”

  • First Impressions and Fresh Perspectives:  Eileen Washburn

    First Impressions and Fresh Perspectives: Eileen Washburn

    By Patrick Edmunds

    “First impressions may be lasting.”  That was the phrase that Mrs. Erickson, my seventh grade English teacher, calmly used to greet her students on a first day of school more than 25 years ago.  It was her cerebral attempt to control a classroom of rambunctious pre-teens, not through threats or punishment, but by suggesting that the way we carry ourselves matters—and that we only get one shot to project a first impression onto others—others who will use it as a glimpse into our true character. While that profound wisdom was largely lost on me at the time, it has stuck with me and proven true in the many years since. But the reflection to follow is not about Mrs. Erickson. It is, however, about another English teacher:  Eileen Washburn—incumbent candidate for the Loveland Board of Education.

    Before proceeding, I must admit that the apparent irony of sharing a “first” impression of someone who is already well known by this community is not lost on me. As the only candidate on the November 2nd ballot who will soon have fulfilled a full term of service on this board, Eileen has already been tested. Loveland voters have had four years to get to know her; four years to see her in action. But bear with me.

    It’s not Eileen who’s new to the scene. It’s me. 

    Having lived in this district for what feels like five minutes (5 months to be precise), I have come to realize the “sticky” nature of this city. Residents love it here. They are from here, and they stay here. Everyone seems to know everyone. To be clear, I love this about Loveland, and I hope this describes my relationship with this community one day.

    But for now, I’m still unpacking boxes and figuring it all out. Given the timing of my arrival in Loveland with the impending election, my lens (and conscience) is clear. My perspective is still fresh and unclouded. I see this as a unique strength in assessing the current pool of candidates.

    My family and I moved into the district knowing virtually no one in the Loveland community. We have no family here. We have no political connections here. We have no “levy baggage.” For that I am grateful. There is so much I don’t know yet about this district. But for the sake of this discussion, let me share what I do know.

    I know that this school district was a primary reason my family chose Loveland as our new home.

    I also know that we moved amid a global pandemic and a period of social and political discord unmatched in our nation’s recent history. We are dealing with hard stuff that will fill history books in years to follow. Despite this, we came here still full of hope. We believed that in Loveland, we could give our kids the absolute best opportunity for a premier public education and a bright future. 

    Sadly, however, our optimism about Loveland Schools was immediately tested upon our arrival. The strife that greeted us was palpable. The wounds (on both sides) of failed levies were still being licked. The rhetoric was intense, and at times hateful. People who had been friends for 20 years were suddenly no longer speaking. And, people and events that were totally unfamiliar to my family just a few weeks prior were suddenly the only topics anyone we met wanted to discuss; these were seemingly the only things that mattered anymore. The crescendo for us was witnessing the police (yes, the police) respond to help calm the angry crowd at the very first School Board meeting we attended.

    In those first few meetings I witnessed screaming. I heard accusations; I heard threats of litigation. I saw a physician flagrantly vote against masks in schools for our youngest students who are still vaccine ineligible. Where did we move, and what is going on here?  Our “welcome” to Loveland was not a first impression that I wanted to last.

    So, now back to things I do know and have recognized (it’s not all doom and gloom) as an unencumbered newcomer. First, I know we can still have hope. Second, that hope lies in Eileen Washburn.

    I have come to know Eileen over the past few months, and who I’ve met is someone who is thoughtful, calm, and measured.  When Eileen speaks, I hear a clear voice of reason that surmounts the noise around her. I hear commonsense policymaking, not political pandering. We need this now more than ever. 

    I know that it can be lonely at the top. Yet, I have seen Eileen bravely break away from the comfort and protection of the crowd, if and when it is in the best interest of the district’s students, families, and staff to do so. Eileen’s morals are unwavering, and her judgment is sound. In decision-making, Eileen chooses what’s right over what’s easy. Her work ethic is unparalleled. 

    I know that Eileen cares. As a parent of district students, she has a personal family stake in the success of our schools. As a teacher, herself (in a neighboring district), dedication to students is in her blood. Eileen is the teacher who will stay after school to support a student who is nervous about trying out for the basketball team (true story!). She’s also the kind of person who would never brag about that.

    In closing, I want to be clear that I am not writing in support of Eileen because I am her neighbor, long-time friend, or family member. I am not writing this because she asked me to. I volunteered. I sought her out because I was impressed with what I saw in her. I am writing this because Eileen showed up for my family when we needed a leader on the board. I know that in her next term, Eileen will continue to advocate for the physical, mental, and emotional health and safety of my kids, and for their long term scholastic success—just like she has already done during our short time here. I also know that she’ll advocate for your kids too…whether you vote for her or not. She just can’t help it; it’s who she is. 

    And that’s my first impression of Eileen Washburn—one that will last a lifetime.


    Patrick Edmunds is a resident of Symmes Township

  • Compassionate students help feed other children through reading at the Loveland Elementary School

    Compassionate students help feed other children through reading at the Loveland Elementary School

    by David Miller

    Loveland, Ohio – Loveland Elementary School (LES) is doing its November Compassion Project “Read to Feed”. The students will be collecting monetary donations for the LIFE Food Pantry based on the amount that they read, “a win/win for the kids AND the pantry!”

    The pantry leaders say that literacy and education are a huge factors in escaping poverty and these students are “amazing”.

    The pantry also asks that if you have a student at LES, “Please support their efforts. If you don’t, please seek one out and let them know they make a huge difference in the lives of their community, especially other children! Thank you for your support – these children are our future.”

  • A response to candidate Kevin Daugherty’s “Qualifications For Becoming A Board Member”

    A response to candidate Kevin Daugherty’s “Qualifications For Becoming A Board Member”

    by Lesley Hodge

    Kevin Dougherty, Loveland Board of Education Vice-President, posted a short video on his campaign website entitled “Thinking Through How To Choose – A Different Approach”.  In it, he identifies the qualities that matter for Board membership as leadership, preparedness, motivation, commitment, and the ability to listen and learn. I agree with all of that – although I question how prepared anyone can be, or ever has been, for stepping into a Board role for the first time.  

    He goes on to say that “what a candidate supports or doesn’t support doesn’t matter unless he or she can get results.” I half agree with that.  It doesn’t much matter what a person is for or against if he doesn’t get results. On the other hand, if a person gets results, what he is for or against is of central importance because that will determine what results he will attempt to achieve. However well the Board members in recent years might have scored with respect to Mr. Dougherty’s list of qualities, they certainly got results. To take only the most salient recent example, in 2019 they succeeded in getting onto the ballot a levy of historic proportions – which was voted down by the community 78% to 22%.  Whatever the Board was for or against in 2019, it was clearly misaligned with what the community was for or against. It is hard to argue, then, as Mr. Dougherty suggests, that it doesn’t matter what “it” is as long as “it” gets accomplished. Of course, we want to elect Board members who can get results. For that very reason, it matters very much what those members support or don’t support.

    I would actually expand Mr. Dougherty’s list. He mentioned being humble but it didn’t make his top five. Humility is an essential characteristic for being a successful Board member. Independent thinker is also imperative. I would rather see a Board grapple with issues in front of the public rather than come out and uniformly vote on things without much discussion. 

    Finally, it is essential to me, a voter and taxpayer, that Board members respect parental rights, support strong academics and a challenging curriculum, and respect taxpayers. It’s a tall order, but I think some of the candidates possess these qualities in abundance. Moreover, we have candidates who genuinely care about putting students first without alienating the residential district that foots the bill.  

    I have seen several candidates dismissed as being “inexperienced”. Obviously, anyone who hasn’t sat on a Board does not have the experience related to being on a Board, and every Board member in history was once in that position. If inexperience were a bar, there would be no Boards.  

    At the end of the day, an inexperienced Board seeking the right results is incomparably to be preferred to an experienced Board seeking the wrong results. Inexperience tends to correct itself; a bad result does not.


    Lesley Hodge is a resident of Symmes Township and the Loveland City School District

  • Robert Hess: Something very disturbing occurring in Loveland School Board election

    Robert Hess: Something very disturbing occurring in Loveland School Board election

    by Robert Hess

    Something very disturbing is occurring in the elections for our Loveland (and possibly others) school board: The politicization of the board and the candidates. In the past, most people running for school boards truly had the interests of the students and the community at heart. Republican, Democrat, Conservative, or Liberal was not an issue. Even when the candidates may have been using the office as a springboard to future political venues. 

    This 2021 race is featuring a block of candidates running to achieve a political purpose. They appear to be running as a block to further their political ideals, regardless of what the ideals really have to do with education and the enhancement of our school district.

    One key issue this block keeps bringing up is Critical Race Theory (CRT) in the curriculum.

    First of all, Critical Race Theory is not a part of the curriculum and is not taught in the school system. (A point that several of the candidates who are not part of the “block” have stated.)

    Secondly, to be part of the curriculum it would have to be approved and instituted at the State level. That has not and is not being done. Yet, members of the block state unequivocally that whether it is here or not, it is coming. Is this a scare tactic? Is it possibly a tactic to unite certain people to vote for them to make sure Critical Race Theory never happens?

    Also, I ask, what is Critical Race Theory? Most people have either no idea or only a vague understanding based upon what rumors they have heard. Why are certain people afraid of elements of CRT. I have tried to study CRT and admit I still do not really know what it is. And if it goes toward teaching the truth, is that a problem. Should we cleanse our education system of the truths we do not want to believe or do not like? Isn’t that a bit scary? (Sounds a little like The Scopes Monkey Trial or Banned in Boston.) Many people are using CRT as a way to unite certain elements and scare those who do not understand what is and is not part of our local and state curriculum and what Critical Race Theory really means.

    Finally, do we really want block voting; i.e. Voting on issues that may not be in the best interest of students and education, but instead benefits a political point of view. Perhaps blocking good issues. Haven’t recent politics caused enough problems in our society without bringing it into the schools?

    Let us make sure that we get and keep politics out of the classroom and leave education to those who truly understand what and how to do it, with our oversight and assistance. Sure, a previous school board almost made some big mistakes. But they were in the best interest of the students and we, the voters, prevented them from implementing those mistakes. Most of those people, both board and administrators, are now gone. Let us make sure that we are trying to improve and broaden the education of our students so that they might avoid the pitfalls that our older generations have set up for them.

    Please vote responsibly, with understanding, and beware of the political tyranny that could be brought to our school system by political blocks attempting to take over our school system.

    Robert Hess lives in the Claiborne West Neighborhood in Loveland.