Author: Loveland Magazine
-

227 Ohio-based Organizations Denied Opportunity to Voice Opposition of Minority Rule Bill
GettyImagesColumbus, Ohio – In a narrow 7-6 vote, the Ohio House Constitutional Resolutions Committee passed a resolution allowing HJR 1 — a bill that seeks to increase the ballot threshold for amending the constitution from a simple majority to 60% — to a floor vote.Following the resolution’s passage, a denial of 111 years of direct democracy right, Catherine Turcer, executive director of Common Cause Ohio, made the following statement representing a coalition of 227 organizations in opposition to a 60 percent threshold and an August special election for special interests.“Since 1912, Ohioans from across the political spectrum have utilized the right to amend our Constitution via the petition process. Direct democracy gives voters the ability to make a real impact and has helped engage Ohioans in the political process. There is no justifiable reason, after over 100 years, to make this already challenging process even harder.“Today, a sham committee shut down public testimony in opposition. This is not what democracy should look like. Extreme lawmakers turned away over 100 Ohioans who took time from their day to show up and testify in opposition. Committee Chair Phil Plummer clearly did not want to hear from voters. He and an ultra-slim margin of his anti-voter colleagues had already made up their minds, and they bullied this bad idea out of committee.“We have a growing coalition of 227 organizations representing hundreds of thousands of voters who will not compromise the sacred principle of one person, one vote. In Ohio and this country, a simple majority means 50 plus one equals democracy. We will not allow this undemocratic, unfair, unnecessary, and unpopular attack on voting rights and freedom to stand.”Additionally, the Ohio Senate passed Senate Joint Resolution 2 this afternoon, which also changes the threshold for passage of amendments to the Ohio Constitution to 60 percent. Similar to HJR 1, this measure makes the citizen initiative process more difficult by requiring 5% of the gubernatorial vote in all 88 counties. These proposals also remove the “cure period” for collecting additional signatures if a campaign falls short. -

Ohio State Board of Ed again delays selecting search firm for new state superintendent
Ohio Department of Education. Photo by WEWS.
The State Board of Education once again voted to delay naming a search firm to identify superintendent candidates.
In a 14-4-1 vote, the board pushed back until May’s board meeting on deciding on a search firm that would bring superintendent candidates for board review. This comes days after Ohio Department of Education’s interim superintendent of public instruction, Dr. Stephanie Siddens, announced she is leaving for a district-level position and as Senate Bill 1 moves through the legislature seeking to restructure the department as a whole.
Board members Teresa Fedor, Antoinette Miranda, Christina Collins and Meryl Johnson voted against postponing search firm selection and Katie Hofmann abstained from voting Tuesday during the April board meeting.
“I believe these candidates are going to be ready to help our students in Ohio, no matter what circumstances they are going to deal with in their responsibility,” Fedor said.
The state board previously narrowed down the candidates to three search firms: Ray & Associates of Cedar Rapids, Iowa; McPherson & Jacobson of Omaha, Nebraska; and the National Association of State Boards of Education in Alexandria, Virginia.
The three search firms gave presentations to the board in December, but the board postponed selecting a search firm at that time as well.
Concerns over Senate Bill 1
Many board members expressed their concerns during this month’s meeting about the uncertainty surrounding the future of the state superintendent’s role because of Senate Bill 1, which passed in the Ohio Senate on March 1.
“I believe that without having firm footing, our potential candidates would be less inclined to throw their hat in the ring,” said board member Diana Fessler. “…Candidates are not going to get in line and say ‘pick me, pick me,’ because the legislation is up in the air. It’s just bad timing.”
SB 1 would rename the department the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce and restructure the department. It would also create a new leadership position under the governor’s cabinet. Two deputy directors, one for primary and secondary education and another for workforce, would also be created under the bill.
The State Board of Education currently leads the process of selecting a state superintendent, who is the head of the department under the ODE as it stands. In most recent amendments to the SB 1 before it was passed by the Ohio Senate, the board of ed would still hold the authority to select the superintendent, but the Senate Education Committee changed the role to act as an “advisor” to the deputy directors, if needed.
Board member John Hagan said the board should hold off on naming a search firm “because we don’t know what the job is.”
“If we knew what the job was, we could move forward quickly,” he said.
Board Vice President Martha Manchester presented the idea of revisiting the candidate applications to make sure their proposals are still up to date.
“We definitely need to make sure that the proposal we are voting on is still up to date and that we are voting on what they are intending to provide us,” she said.
At-large member Brandon Kern expressed concern about the financial responsibility of selecting a search firm.
“With all the uncertainty, we are not going to get the public’s return on investment that we should by contracting a search firm,” he said.
Process to appoint a new interim superintendent
The State Board of Education leadership will ask Siddens to recommend an internal candidate or candidates for the board’s consideration.

Dr. Stephanie K. Siddens
Photo by the Ohio Department of EducationThen the state board leadership will invite the recommended candidates to interview in executive session during next month’s meeting, which will take place May 8-9.
There could potentially be a vote to name a new interim superintendent at the May meeting and a draft resolution to appoint an interim superintendent will be included in the board materials for a potential vote.
Siddens named Upper Arlington City School’s Deputy Superintendent
Siddens is going to Upper Arlington City Schools to be the district’s deputy superintendent. The district’s board of education approved Siddens’ appointment during its Tuesday night meeting.
“It has been an honor and a privilege to support Ohio’s children, families and educators as interim superintendent of public instruction,” Siddens said in a statement. “I stand ready to ensure a successful transition.”
Her contract with Upper Arlington City Schools begins July 1 and ends July 31, 2025, according to board documents.
“I have been so impressed with the high-quality programming and dedicated, excellent staff at Upper Arlington City Schools,” Siddens said during the UA board meeting.
Her last day at ODE has not been confirmed.
___________________________________
Follow OCJ Reporter Megan Henry on Twitter.MEGAN HENRY
-

Student hunger is pervasive in Ohio
Getty Images
____________________________
EDITOR’S NOTE ABOUT LOVELAND SCHOOLS
The Loveland School District participates in the National School Lunch Program. Through this program, free or reduced-cost meals are available to children whose families meet certain criteria. Applications are available online and at any of the school office locations. Learn more…
Apply for the free or reduced-cost meals
____________________________
Student hunger looks different in every school district in Ohio, but legislative intervention could resolve the issues, from the funding gap to the stigma attached to meal support, advocates say.
Districts across the state have held fundraisers to pay down unpaid meal accounts, and alternatives to hot meals are available, often in the form of peanut butter and jelly sandwiches and other cold offerings.
But combatting student hunger often comes with a “pride gap” – those that are too embarrassed to ask for help – and students who would rather not eat than face a cafeteria of students who will be able to identify their free or reduced lunch status.
Schools do what they can to make sure food is available for students, but they can’t eliminate that stigma that puts kids into “categories.”
“It still doesn’t eliminate that category of kids, it doesn’t capture hunger in totality,” said Alexis Weber, food service director for Austintown Local Schools. “Because someone’s income might not directly indicate whether or not a student is hungry.”
Hunger landscape
Food insecurity is very much a part of the landscape in Ohio, with Feeding America ranking Ohio 13th in percentage of children with food insecurity.
The Children’s Defense Fund Ohio found that 1 in 6 children and as many as 1 in 4 in some counties, faces food insecurity.
And 1 in 3 of those children facing hunger does not qualify for free or reduced meals (meaning their family falls just outside the 185% of the federal poverty line threshold required for the free or reduced price lunch program). And many others don’t participate for fear of judgment.
“The program inherently labels and puts kids into categories,” CDF-Ohio stated in a white paper on student hunger. “The stigma felt by students that the program is only for low-income kids causes many children not to participate.”
Participation in the school meals has been linked to “positive educational and health outcomes for children,” according to CDF-Ohio, and students are less likely to have “nutrient inadequacies.”

Source: Ohio Department of Education According to the Ohio Department of Education, participation in the National School Lunch Program from 2017 to 2022 has largely remained the same, even as school enrollment goes down.
In the 2021-22 school year, statewide participation in school lunch was 57.6%, up slightly from the 2019-2020 school year, when it was 54.1%. The 2020-2021 year wasn’t calculated because of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to the ODE.
Free and reduced lunch programs are supported through the federal National School Lunch Program, and free breakfasts are also a part of the strategy to get children fed while they’re required to attend school. The ODE said not all schools participate in the NSLP, but of the more than 3,700 schools who do, more than 91% operate both the NSLP and the School Breakfast Program.
“These figures are increases from school year 2019-2020 (pre-pandemic),” the ODE stated in a December 2022 report.
A household is eligible for free school meals currently at 130% of the federal poverty level, meaning $36,075 or less for a family of four. For a reduced-price meal, households are eligible at 185% of the federal poverty level, or up to $51,338 for a family of four.
But a gap exists between the federal funding and district-level general funds, which school nutrition administrators have said can be filled through state investment.
School admin focus on universal meals
As budget talks continue at the Ohio Statehouse, Weber and other school food service leaders told the stories of their districts, imploring lawmakers to consider funding for universal lunches in the state, not only to reduce the hunger, but also to eliminate identification of those receiving financial help.
Chesapeake Union Exempted Village School District Superintendent Doug Hale told the Ohio House Finance Committee that the expiration in June 2022 of pandemic-era waivers that allowed schools to provide free school lunches to all students regardless of family income made Appalachian districts like his “brace themselves for the challenge to come.”
“I’m here to testify that hungry kids can not perform academically, and we have hungry children in our district,” Hale said.
What Hale also found as he worked through the challenge was that his district’s struggles weren’t unlike districts in the rest of the state.
Chesapeake’s student meal debt sits at $60,000, according to Hale. Other districts, like the Lancaster City School District and Westerville City Schools, have $40,000 in meal debts.
“I’m here to tell you that Chesapeake, Westerville and Lancaster, we serve kids, that’s as far as we’re alike,” Hale said.
In a snapshot by the Children’s Defense Fund-Ohio, the group found several schools with thousands in student meal debt, including Washington Local Schools in Lucas County ($38,000), Lorain County’s North Ridgeville City School District ($14,040), Minford Local Schools in Scioto County ($13,771), Delaware City Schools ($8,693), Alexander Local Schools ($7,000), and Wellington Exempted School District in Lorain County ($4,108).
Pickerington Schools currently has more than $46,000 in charges, according to Brent Kasler, supervisor of food services.
The stigma of free and reduced lunches, particularly in high schools, flows through rural, urban and suburban districts all the same.
“This means many high school and middle school students who need these meals go without,” Hale told the finance committee.
Hale’s testimony was bolstered by other district nutrition officials, who testified with the finance committee and its subcommittee on primary and secondary education in March.
Daryn Guarino, of the Alexander Local School District in Athens County, told the subcommittee that while the district has an alternative option for students who have a negative balance and can’t receive the hot lunch, there are students who don’t come back to the cafeteria once they’re told they can’t receive the same lunch as other students. This included a six-year-old, he said, in a situation that made him question whether he wanted to do the job.
“I’m sorry, but despite everyone’s best efforts and intentions, a student went without lunch for several days because they were ashamed that they didn’t have the money to pay for it,” Guarino told the OCJ. “Our willingness to feed them did not get them fed. I wish I were lying.”
Donating to districts
For now, donations are accepted to help pay down meal debt, typically through individual districts’ treasurer’s office.
“We usually have individuals or organizations that will contact a school about helping to pay off a student’s negative balances,” Pickerington’s Kasler told the OCJ.
Donations sent to the treasurer’s office in Pickerington are transferred to the food service account, where balances in school buildings can be paid off.
Other districts contacted by the OCJ also said financial support should be directed through district treasurer’s offices.
_______________________________
SUSAN TEBBEN_____________________________





MARTY SCHLADEN




