Tag: Gov. Mike DeWine

  • Ohioan reports being recruited for plot targeting Gov. DeWine at his home

    Ohioan reports being recruited for plot targeting Gov. DeWine at his home

    Piqua, Ohio – A Miami County resident reported to police being recruited to take part in a citizen’s arrest of Gov. Mike DeWine at his Cedarville home a week ago, but the plot evidently never materialized.

    The plot is alleged to have involved Renea Turner, a former write-in candidate for governor who ran against DeWine in 2018. A state representative says he recently met with Turner prior to the alleged call and she inquired about the governor’s home, the Ohio Capital Journal has learned. 

    The Ohio State Highway Patrol, which handles security for the governor and his residences, was notified of the report by local law enforcement and is investigating. 

    At a press conference Friday afternoon to discuss allocation of CARES Act funding in Ohio, DeWine told reporters he was unaware of the alleged plot and had not been briefed on it to that point.

    This report to police came just a week after 13 men were arrested for reportedly planning to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and it follows months of protests against DeWine and state health officials. 

    According to a Piqua Police Department report from Oct. 16, a citizen told an officer about being called earlier that morning by Turner, a Springfield native who is an outspoken critic of DeWine. Turner reportedly asked if they wanted to take part in an attempt to arrest the governor at his home later that weekend and try him for allegations of tyranny.

    The Ohio Capital Journal initially declined to identify Turner as the alleged caller, as law enforcement would not confirm if she had been under investigation or charged with a crime and she could not be reached by the Ohio Capital Journal for comment.

    The Ohio State Highway Patrol has been made aware of the police report but would not say if an investigation has been launched.

    Since the original publication of this story, Turner has spoken on the record with cleveland.com about the call, which she confirmed took place. She told the outlet that she did speak to the Miami County person about placing DeWine under house arrest, but reportedly denied discussing any specific plans. 

    The Capital Journal is not identifying the person who reported the incident to police after the person asked to remain anonymous for safety reasons, having already followed up with Piqua law enforcement about a threat made against them online.

    The person who reported the call told Ohio Capital News that the plot stemmed from anger toward the governor’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The person said they too are a critic of DeWine and claimed to have recently filed a citizen affidavit seeking criminal charges against the governor. State Rep. John Becker, R-Union Twp., who has led an impeachment effort against DeWine in the Statehouse, has urged Ohioans to submit such affidavits about the governor.

    “Do I think (DeWine) needs to be arrested? Absolutely,” the person said. “But all that needs to happen within the confines of the law.”

    They claimed they were initially excited when receiving the call last Friday, thinking the conversation would be about the ongoing search from DeWine critics to find a prosecutor willing to bring charges against him.

    “(The caller) said ‘no, we the people, we’re going to arrest him,’” the source said.

    According to this person, the caller described several supposed penalties for a citizen’s trial on tyranny — permanent exile or execution.

    According to this person, the caller described several supposed penalties for a citizen’s trial on tyranny — permanent exile or execution.

    Soon after the call, they decided to contact the police.

    “If I don’t do something about this and something happens, I’m either legally culpable or at least I’m going to feel bad,” they said. “Not that I have any love lost between me and Gov. Mike DeWine. Again, I think he needs to be in prison. But again, if (the caller) had done something … I would have felt ethically responsible, right?”

    State legislator says Turner recently asked about DeWine’s home in private chat

    Becker told the Capital Journal he met with Turner a few weeks ago in Columbus at her request to speak about theoretical criminal charges against the governor. While his focus has been on locating a willing prosecutor, he said Turner spoke about finding a county sheriff to make the arrest.

    “I just kind of shrugged my shoulders and said, ‘good luck with that,’” Becker recalled.

    Then came an unusual change in subject: Turner wanted to know more about the governor’s residence in Cedarville. Becker said Turner asked whether the personal residence constituted public property during DeWine’s term as governor.

    “It was kind of a strange question,” Becker said.

    John Becker aided Turner by providing information about DeWine’s residence and if it constituted public property.

    After the conversation ended, Becker asked Turner’s question to the Legislative Service Commission, a nonpartisan group which gives private law research to lawmakers. He learned the home remains a private residence, and passed that information along to her.

    Becker did not hear again from Turner after that. Earlier this week, he heard from the Miami County resident about the alleged plot. The person told him about Turner and Becker recognized her name from their recent meeting.

    Becker said he informed the Statehouse’s sergeant at arms about the situation when returning to work earlier this week. He later posted a YouTube video about the incident, referring to the person who reported the call to police as a “hero.”

    Becker confirmed to the Capital Journal he was contacted by the Ohio State Highway Patrol on Friday. The lawmaker said he described to the Patrol his interactions with Turner and the Miami County resident.

    Piqua Police Chief Rick Byron told the Capital Journal on Thursday the citizen’s report was turned over to the Patrol.

    “At this point, we have not followed up with them and have no plans to do so,” Byron said, noting the alleged caller is not from Piqua and therefore his department does not have jurisdiction. “We’re pretty confident that (the Patrol is) going to handle this situation.”

    Dan Tierney, a spokesperson for the governor’s office, referred questions about the situation to the Patrol.

    In a brief statement on Thursday, Lt. Tiffany Meeks told the Capital Journal: “For security, the Patrol does not discuss threats or security operations involving the governor.” The Patrol later confirmed to the Dayton Daily News it was “currently investigating the incident.”

    Cleveland.com quoted Turner on Friday as saying officials with the Patrol came to her home that morning “to check out my temperament and what my plans are.”

    Since the report was made on Oct. 16, the governor has hosted three press conferences at his Cedarville home: his traditional virus-related updates on Oct. 20 and 22, and the CARES Act press conference with legislative leaders on Friday.

    After this story was first published, reporters asked DeWine during his CARES Act press conference about his reaction to the alleged plot.

    “I don’t know the details of the so-called plan,” he said. “I can’t really comment on that.”

    Asked if he was shocked to learn about such a plot, DeWine answered: “No. I’m not shocked by it. At this point in my life, not much shocks me anymore. It’s a sad thing.”

    This is the latest in a series of alleged plots targeting political leaders in 2020 for their responses to the pandemic. In Michigan, state and federal law enforcement foiled a plot to kidnap and try Gov. Whitmer, with seven of the men being charged under the state’s anti-terrorism law. 

    Police in that case have alleged the Whitmer plot was hatched in a meeting held in Dublin, Ohio this summer. The same groupof men also hoped to target Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam. 

    There is no known connection between these plots and the one reported in Piqua.

    Turner is former governor candidate

    Turner, of Springfield in Clark County, campaigned for governor as a write-in candidate in 2018. 

    Turner encountered DeWine on the campaign trail, later posting a picture of themselves together to social media. A post on her Facebook page claims she pretended to be a supporter of DeWine’s, then told him after the picture was taken she was actually campaigning against him.

    Turner received 185 votes in the 2018 general election, including one from the person who later reported her call to Piqua police. 

    Turner has shared several posts from state Rep. Nino Vitale, R-Urbana, who has made headlines throughout 2020 for posting falsehoods about the virus — such as an April claim that it may have been created by Bill Gates. 

    Turner received 128 more votes as a write-in candidate for Springfield mayor in 2019 before turning her attention back to DeWine amid the coronavirus pandemic. 

    Her social media pages are littered with conspiracy theories involving the virus, government microchips and vaccine mandates. Many of the posts have been flagged by Facebook as spreading misinformation.

    Turner has shared several posts from state Rep. Nino Vitale, R-Urbana, who has made headlines throughout 2020 for posting falsehoods about the virus such as an April claim that it may have been created by Bill Gates. 

    Turner shared one post by Vitale from May 18, in which he accused DeWine of “giving himself total dictatorial power.” Vitale also falsely suggested the governor knew about the virus in March 2019, many months before the novel coronavirus was ever discovered. 

    In July, Turner posted photos of herself protesting health orders at the Ohio Statehouse with a signs referring to the governor as Hitler. 

    Turner took to the Statehouse again on Thursday, proclaiming she had removed the governor from office through a self-issued declaration. A video shared to Facebook shows Turner taking an oath of office, with a signed sheet of paper claiming her to be the next governor of Ohio. 

    Turner did not address the Thursday incident in her interview with cleveland.com.

    ‘It’s wrong morally, it’s wrong legally’

    DeWine reiterated on Friday that the plot against Whitmer was “despicable” and added he denounced any effort by people to subvert the legal system and target public officials.

    “We are seeing people out there who believe that,” the governor said. “We have an obligation, each one of us as elected officials, opinion leaders, to denounce that and say ‘that is wrong.’ It’s wrong morally, it’s wrong legally, it’s anti-democratic, it’s anti-everything this country stands for.”

    While DeWine has enjoyed widespread, bipartisan support throughout 2020 for his response to the pandemic, his administration has also been the subject of intense condemnation. Four legislators have endorsed his impeachment, and dozens of others have supported various bills seeking to limit the executive’s power to handle an infectious disease.

    Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine in a Zoom call with reporters in August outside his Cedarville home. Screenshot by Marty Schladen, Ohio Capital Journal.

    Repeated protests at the Statehouse led DeWine to move his press conferences from Capitol Square to a government building elsewhere due to “security reasons,” WKYC reported in April.

    That same month, Cleveland.com reported that Ohioans protesting the state’s public health orders were seen “driving by DeWine’s Greene County house, filming it and counting cars.” The outlet quoted a DeWine spokesperson as saying security officials were aware of this surveillance but could not comment further.

    In May, protesters repeatedly targeted the home of Dr. Amy Acton, who was then serving as director of the Ohio Department of Health. There were reports that some of the protesters were armed with guns, and one person was photographed carrying an anti-Semitic sign. Not long after, Acton resigned as state health director.

    In May, protesters repeatedly targeted the home of Dr. Amy Acton, who was then serving as director of the Ohio Department of Health. There were reports that some of the protesters were armed with guns, and one person was photographed carrying an anti-Semitic sign. Not long after, Acton resigned as state health director.

    The state has been without a permanent health director in the months since. A replacement was announced in September, but the person selected withdrew from consideration after learning of the harassment leveled against Acton. The Ohio Department of Health continues to be led by an interim director.

    Also in May, Democratic House Minority Leader Emilia Sykes reported a phone call to police threatening to kill her father, state Sen. Vernon Sykes, if she did not “step aside” politically.


    (This story was edited by Loveland Magazine)


    Tyler Buchanan

    Tyler Buchanan is an award-winning journalist who has covered Ohio politics and government for the past decade. A Bellevue native and graduate of Bowling Green State University, he most recently spent 6 1/2 years as a reporter and editor of The Athens Messenger and Vinton-Jackson Courier newspapers. He is a member of the BG News Alumni Society Board and was a 2019 fellow in the Kiplinger Program in Public Affairs Journalism.
  • The search continues for a new state health director, DeWine says

    The search continues for a new state health director, DeWine says


    Tyler Buchanan

    Tyler Buchanan is an award-winning journalist who has covered Ohio politics and government for the past decade. A Bellevue native and graduate of Bowling Green State University, he most recently spent 6 1/2 years as a reporter and editor of The Athens Messenger and Vinton-Jackson Courier newspapers. He is a member of the BG News Alumni Society Board and was a 2019 fellow in the Kiplinger Program in Public Affairs Journalism.
  • Food stamp benefits available to eligible Ohio schoolchildren attending classes remotely

    Food stamp benefits available to eligible Ohio schoolchildren attending classes remotely

    Thousands of Ohio children who qualify for free or reduced-price meals at school will soon receive money to buy food through the Pandemic-Electronic Benefit Transfer (P-EBT) program, the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (ODJFS) announced last week.

    This funding was made possible by the federal Families First Coronavirus Response Act, a release said, adding that ODJFS provided more than $250 million in P-EBT benefits to more than 850,000 Ohio children last spring. The agency recently received federal approval to issue a second round of benefits for children enrolled in schools operating fully remotely or with a hybrid remote/in-person model, the release said.

    “As families juggle the challenges of work, remote learning, and additional responsibilities, I hope that these additional benefits eliminate the stress of providing healthy, nutritious meals,” said Gov. Mike DeWine in the release.

    ODJFS is working with the Ohio Department of Education and local school districts to identify all eligible children, which includes children participating in remote learning for at least five consecutive days between the dates Aug. 1 and Sept. 30 who are already eligible for free or reduced-price meals.

    “Ensuring that our most vulnerable children have access to nutritious meals remains a top priority,” said ODJFS Director Kimberly Hall. “As families continue to navigate the challenges related to COVID, we are happy to have the P-EBT program as an additional resource to offer our children and their families.”

    As with the benefits issued last spring, the P-EBT benefits will be added to the Ohio Direction cards of families that receive Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, the release said. Families that do not receive SNAP benefits will be sent P-EBT cards with the one-time benefit added and no application is needed, it added.

    Individuals may qualify for SNAP if their household’s gross monthly income is at or under 130% of the federal poverty guidelines. Ohioans can apply at benefits.ohio.gov.

  • Feds release unemployment guidance, could be a long time before supplements reach Ohioans

    Feds release unemployment guidance, could be a long time before supplements reach Ohioans

    By Marty Schladen Ohio Capital Journal

    As promised, the U.S. Department of Labor last week released guidance to the states on how it will disburse money to supplement unemployment checks. But it’s far from clear when — or whether — hundreds of thousands of out-of-work Ohioans will see those funds.

    A $600-a-week federal supplement had been credited with keeping millions of unemployed Americans — and the economy — afloat, but it expired at the end of July. 

    The Democratically controlled House passed an extension of the benefit. The Republican-controlled Senate introduced a bill cutting the supplement to $200 a week, but failed to pass it.

    Then President Donald Trump on Aug. 8 signed a memorandum that would repurpose federal disaster relief funds to provide $300 a week in additional support. But it would exclude people getting less than $100 a week in state benefits — a group comprising many minimum-wage workers and service workers who get a low hourly wage and tips on top of that.

    The administration of Gov. Mike DeWine signed on to the plan on Monday, saying that additional guidance was needed from the Labor Department before any predictions could be made about when funds would be disbursed.

    The money can’t come quickly enough for many Ohioans. 

    According to the U.S. Census’ Household Pulse Survey for the week of July 9-14, nearly 1 million Ohio adults sometimes or often did not have enough to eat in the past week. In addition, more than 400,000 hadn’t paid the previous month’s rent and 360,000 homeowners hadn’t made the previous month’s mortgage payment.

    “This is before the $600 (federal unemployment supplement) expired,” Zach Schiller, research director for the think tank Policy Matters Ohio, said.

    Earlier in the week, DeWine also underscored the urgency of getting money out to unemployed Ohioans. He praised Trump for taking the actions he did and he called on Congress to get busy — something that’s unlikely to happen until early September at the soonest.

    However, state officials have to clear several hurdles before they can start distributing the federal dollars Trump has attempted to repurpose.

    For example, “States will need to develop a self-certification process in accordance with FEMA instructions for claimants to certify weekly that they are unemployed or partially unemployed due to disruptions caused by COVID-19,” the Labor Department guidance says.

    And state officials will have to reprogram antiquated, overwhelmed unemployment systems to process the benefit.

    “We are examining the DOL guidance on lost wages assistance to see what kind of system programming is needed in order to pay these unemployment benefits,” Dan Teirney, DeWine’s press secretary, said in an email. “As noted in the guidance, all states are required to develop a self-certification process for claimants based on instructions from FEMA.”

    He said that once state officials figure all that out, they’ll make beneficiaries whole, but it’s hard to know when that will be.

    “While (the Ohio Department of Jobs and Family Services) intends to pay these retroactive benefits as quickly and efficiently as possible, there are several procedural and programming steps that must take place before that can happen,” Tierney said.

    There is also a serious question about whether the Trump plan is legal. Georgetown University law professor David Super last week wrote that it is a clear violation of the Stafford Act, the federal law governing disaster assistance.

    Schiller criticized the scheme as ill-conceived at a time when so many Ohioans are in desperate need of assistance.

    “Altogether, the whole thing is kind of a half-baked measure,” he said.


    Marty Schladen

    Marty Schladen has been a reporter for decades, working in Indiana, Texas and other places before returning to his native Ohio to work at The Columbus Dispatch in 2017. He’s won state and national journalism awards for investigations into utility regulation, public corruption, the environment, prescription drug spending and other matters.
  • Ohio Republicans slammed over coronavirus enforcementBy Marty Schladen – July 13, 2020

    Ohio Republicans slammed over coronavirus enforcementBy Marty Schladen – July 13, 2020

    Columbus, OhioThe coronavirus is raging in Ohio, but the state’s Republican leaders seem disinclined to enforce rules intended to protect against it. (How does Hamilton County avoid Level 4 Alert)

    Attorney General Dave Yost won’t say whether he’ll support enforcement of new orders to wear masks in the state’s hardest-hit counties. And the official who issued them, Gov. Mike DeWine, has made several statements indicating that he doesn’t want to see anybody punished for not following measures intended to slow the spread of the deadly disease.

    Mike Samet the Public Information Officer for Hamilton County Public Health told Loveland Magazine on Friday that from an enforcement perspective, as a county agency, the Health Department is not able to issue citations. “Nobody wants to be the mask police. This is education over enforcement, he said. Samet added that he wants people to understand why masks are important now, not punish them for non-compliance.

    Ohio set a record for new cases Friday — 1,525 — after seeing them trend sharply upward over the past few weeks. The case count was nearly triple the three-week average of 531.

    Gov. Mike DeWine, has made several statements indicating that he doesn’t want to see anybody punished for not following measures intended to slow the spread of the deadly disease.

    The news comes as six other states — Alabama, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Oregon and Texas — set new single-day records of their own on Thursday. It also was the sixth day out of the past 10 in which the United States set one-day records for new cases of the coronavirus, which now has killed more than 3,000 in Ohio and more than 130,000 nationwide.

    Also last week, a New York Times data analysis showed that the disease in the United States is taking on a disturbing racial dimension, with Blacks and Latinos around three times as likely as whites to get the new coronavirus.

    The World Health Organization and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control both have said that widespread mask wearing would reduce the spread of the disease. One study indicated that if 80% of people wore them, the spread would plummet to one twelfth what it would be if nobody did.

    Yet Yost, the state’s top law-enforcement officer, last week didn’t respond to questions about whether he supports enforcement of last week’s orders that people in Ohio’s 12 hardest-hit counties must wear masks inside public buildings.

    In late March, Yost ordered that many abortions be halted in Ohio, arguing that the move was intended to conserve healthcare resources in the face of the coronavirus pandemic.

    In June, he urged a municipal court to drop charges against a couple accused of opening their Cambridge-area restaurant in defiance of an earlier, DeWine-issued health order that it remain closed.

    Then earlier this week, Yost said that the Columbus city government doesn’t have the power to enforce mask orders in state buildings — places where many Republican lawmakers have refused to wear them.

    On Monday, a spokeswoman for Yost explained that the attorney general can’t have any official involvement in cases relating to health orders unless asked by local prosecutors. “We don’t have the authority,” the spokeswoman, Bethany McCorkle, said in a text message.

    She added, however, that Yost has worn a mask since before there was a health order and encourages others to do the same.

    The attorney general and his staff haven’t responded to subsequent questions about the order DeWine issued on Wednesday evening requiring masks in the worst-hit counties.

    David Pepper (Photo from Ballotpedia)

    Ohio Democrats are already up in arms about Republican legislative leaders’ refusal to share details about the spread of coronavirus in the Statehouse and surrounding office towers. David Pepper, the party chairman, on Friday slammed the attorney general for his apparent reluctance to support the enforcement of mask orders.

    “As far as Dave Yost is concerned, refusing to enforce health orders is just one more example that the Ohio GOP has become the party of Donald Trump, Nino Vitale and John Becker,” Pepper said in a text message. “Sadly Ohio COVID cases are spiking because of it.”

    “Even though initially it appeared that Mike DeWine was being guided by scientists and public health experts, it seems that politics and the desires of the business community are driving more of the governor’s decision making now,” party chairman David Pepper said.

    President Donald Trump has repeatedly downplayed the pandemic, floated unproven cures for it and refused to appear in public wearing a mask. Among his other statements, Ohio Rep. Nino Vitale, R-Urbana, last Tuesday took to Facebook to urge Ohioans to stop even getting tested for coronavirus. And Ohio Rep. John Becker, R-Union Township, has introduced legislation that would strip state officials of the power to enforce any health order.

    Meanwhile, in the absence of much support from his party, DeWine has said he doesn’t plan to use his authority under his mask order to arrest people for not following it.

    Ohio Governor Mike DeWine

    “We’re not talking about throwing people in jail,” DeWine said during a press conference Thursday. “This is a law to advise people what to do.”

    DeWine has enjoyed overwhelming, bipartisan support over his handling of the coronavirus. But at least for Ohio’s top Democrat, patience might be wearing thin.

    “Even though initially it appeared that Mike DeWine was being guided by scientists and public health experts, it seems that politics and the desires of the business community are driving more of the governor’s decision making now,” Pepper said. “Even with fewer cases, even West Virginia and Kentucky are being more proactive in addressing the pandemic.”


    The Ohio Capital Journal is a hard-hitting, independent, nonprofit news organization dedicated to connecting Ohioans to their state government and its impact on their lives. The Capital Journal combines Ohio state government coverage with relentless investigative journalism, deep dives into the consequences of policy, political insight and principled commentary.

  • Families weigh the risks of sending a loved one to a nursing home during the coronavirus pandemic

    Families weigh the risks of sending a loved one to a nursing home during the coronavirus pandemic

    By Ginger Christ and Rachel Dissell

    Data analysis and Graphics by Cid Standifer 

    This article provided to Loveland Magazine was edited by David Miller and is by by Eye on Ohio, the nonprofit, nonpartisan Ohio Center for Journalism. Please join their free mailing list as this helps us provide more public service reporting.  

    In early March, just as Ohioans were learning about the first cases of novel coronavirus in the state, Anna Bondar’s grandfather fell at his Cleveland home.

    Luckily, the 92-year old, who lives with dementia, wasn’t injured badly.

    The tight-knit family started to discuss the possibility of a nursing home, though they had serious reservations.

    Their tough choice was made even more difficult by mounting fears about the coronavirus.  In nearly four months, COVID-19  has infected more than 31,191 people statewide and has proven particularly deadly for residents of long-term care facilities in Ohio.

    Seventy percent of the reported deaths in Ohio due to COVID-19 complications have been in long-term care facilities, which is among the highest in the country. 

    Nationally the portion of COVID-19-related deaths in long-term care facilities has hovered just over 40%, though the amount of testing done in nursing homes varies significantly by state. 

    Every day, families like Bondar’s are making what can feel like an impossible choice – whether to send a loved one to a nursing home where they will receive around-the-clock specialized care but face a greater risk of contracting COVID-19, or to care for that person at home where risk of transmission is lower but providing care can be more challenging. 

    Even before the pandemic, sorting through the myriad of quality ratings and measures was daunting enough. Then, COVID-19 deaths started to soar. 

    Now, families and seniors agonize over what could be life or death choice using confusing numbers on infection “hotspots” and without the ability to visit nursing homes to observe how the staff cares for residents – which is the number one recommendation of most advocates. 

    Dr. Amy Acton, director of the Department of Health

    State officials, including Dr. Amy Acton, the former director of the Department of Health, have emphasized that “congregate” settings like nursing homes are at highest risk of infection. Staff, who often travel between facilities, need to be in close contact with residents to provide care. And residents, who are primarily older and have multiple medical conditions, are more susceptible to COVID-19-related complications. 

    “All of this makes it high risk. At the same time, it’s really necessary for many patients to be there,” said Dr. Steven Schwartz, a geriatric physician at the Cleveland Clinic who travels to nursing homes as part of the Clinic’s Center for Connected Care. 

    Ohio National Guardmembers will begin testing all staff members and any residents who likely were exposed to COVID-19 in the state’s nursing homes, Gov. Mike DeWine announced May 27. What are being called Congregate Care Unified Response Teams will focus on facilities where confirmed or assumed positive cases are reported in hopes of reducing the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths in Ohio’s nursing homes, which as of May 27 was 5,324 resident cases and more than 1,442 deaths.  

    Infection rates in Ohio Nursing Homes

     

    Making an educated decision

    Last month, state officials began to release the numbers of reported infections and deaths in long-term care facilities, which include nursing homes, rehabilitation centers, and assisted living centers. 

    But it’s unclear how much the numbers – which are reported weekly and are also tracked cumulatively – matter for families currently trying to choose a facility. 

    The state, on its coronavirus website, says the infection and death numbers shouldn’t replace a thoughtful conversation with a nursing facility about infection control practices and that “residents and family members should understand that the presence of COVID-19 at a facility is [in] no way an indicator of a facility that isn’t following proper procedures.”

    Yet many in the health care industry say infection information should be considered, along with other factors, when deciding which site to choose.

    “If you see a nursing home with a large outbreak, that’s something to worry about. If you see a nursing home with a small outbreak, I’m not sure it means anything but bad luck.” 

    “If you see a nursing home with a large outbreak, that’s something to worry about. If you see a nursing home with a small outbreak, I’m not sure it means anything but bad luck,” said Dr. James Campbell, department chair of geriatric medicine at MetroHealth. 

    The infection information provided by the state can be useful, for instance, if a family is choosing between two similar facilities, said Nate Cyrill, a Long Term Care Ombudsman for Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain and Medina counties. 

    Since information on the virus changes rapidly, most families still rely on the quality measures that were available before COVID-19, including existing state and federal online guides Cyril said. 

    One of the commonly-used ranking systems, maintained by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, assigns ratings – from 1 to 5 “stars” – to facilities based on performance on quality measures, staffing and inspections. 

    The number of “stars” Ohio’s nursing homes received, however,  does not appear to have a correlation to the number of infections reported to the state, based on a comparison of the publicly available information. The analysis did not include assisted living facilities.

    Cases vs. Star rating

     

    “You want to look for a nursing home that’s four of five stars preferably but even that doesn’t tell you the whole story,” Steven Schwartz said.

    There are numerous 1-star rated facilities that have reported few infections, like Whetstone Gardens and Care Center in Columbus, which has reported 9 cases or 8 per 100 residents. 

    Salem North Healthcare Center

    Salem North Healthcare Center in northern Columbiana County had 51 patients test positive for the virus as of May 20, as well as five staff, according to the state. It is rated a 5-star facility, the highest rating from CMS. 

    It’s one of four 5-star facilities with an infection rate over 50 cases per 100 residents, based on Medicare’s calculation of each facility’s average number of residents. (The rate does not include infections among staff because the number of staff in each facility was not available.)

    Since April, the focus on high numbers of reported infections, often referred to as clusters, in long-term care facilities has intensified. In some cases, those numbers are a reflection of the level of testing, said Fred Stratmann, general counsel and chief compliance officer for CommuniCare Health Services. It doesn’t mean all of the residents with a positive test had symptoms of COVID-19. The state infection numbers also don’t show the residents who have recovered from the virus, he said. 

    CommuniCare, which operates close to 90 health care facilities in seven states has been proactive about testing, Stratmann said. When COVID-19 cases started to appear at the North Salem facility, the company enlisted the state’s “strike team” to proactively test all of the residents. It has since re-tested all of the residents who were initially negative and purchased 3,000 testing kits to supplement what the state could provide. 

    “We wanted to be certain of the extent of COVID in this center in order to be able to properly treat it and to fight back against it,” Stratmann said. The facility does that by isolating any COVID-19-postive patients in a separate unit with its own dedicated staff and by admitting new residents to an observation unit for 14 days to make sure they have no symptoms of infection, he said. 

    Restrictions on visits make choices harder

    The most effective way to scout out a facility typically is to visit it, preferably unannounced, said Dr. James Campbell, department chair of geriatric medicine at MetroHealth. However, because visitors aren’t permitted in nursing homes right now, the next best thing is to ask detailed questions about care, any COVID-19 cases and infection control measures, he said. 

    Campbell also suggested turning to hospital staff, who work with nursing homes regularly, for advice. Social workers can place five people in a week, while most individuals face that decision, at most, only a few times in their lives, he said.

    Cyrill said his agency can also provide information that can’t be found online for families trying to choose between facilities.

    Cyrill said his agency can also provide information that can’t be found online for families trying to choose between facilities.

    The agency, along with other similar independent agencies across the state, investigates complaints in long-term care, skilled nursing, group homes and rehabilitation facilities and can share what are called “verified complaints” that aren’t otherwise available publicly.

    Most of the complaints investigated in relation to COVID-19, Cyrill said, have been related to visitation or the ability of families to get information on a loved one’s condition.

    It’s been harder, though, for Cyrill and his colleagues to investigate complaints with COVID-19 restrictions in place.

    It’s been harder, though, for Cyrill and his colleagues to investigate complaints with COVID-19 restrictions in place.

    Under normal circumstances, an ombudsperson would go to the facility and talk to patients and could do so without announcing the visit in advance. Since visits are restricted for infection control reasons, they have to work through staff to speak to residents or to ask questions, which isn’t optimal. And they aren’t able to make direct observations.

    “It makes our job much more challenging,” Cyrill said. 

    At the North Salem facility, which has had about a dozen new residents admitted or transfered from other facilities, the staff has given “virtual tours” over the phone to family members or prospective residents who were in the hospital, Stratmann said. The company also invested in technology that won’t replace face-to-face visits but enables more family contact and the ability and for staff to help keep residents’ spirits up by making videos of activities, like dancing and singing, to keep them connected with the local community. 

    In addition, Stratmann said they walk families through the infection control procedures and share techniques they have implemented to improve health outcomes for patients with COVID-19 including, when appropriate:

    • Treating residents with anticoagulant medications to reduce the risk of blood clots and strokes, which has been a factor in some COVID-19-related fatalities. 
    • Using Amino Acid supplements, which emerging studies show may inhibit virus replication.
    • Practicing “proning” or positioning residents, while awake, flat on their belly and chest to reduce the buildup of fluid in lung tissue and reduce the risk of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, which has been associated with many COVID-19 fatalities.

    The idea of putting their beloved grandfather in a nursing home was gut-wrenching

    Choosing home

    For Bondar’s family, the idea of putting their beloved grandfather in a nursing home was gut-wrenching, especially as visitation was curtailed to limit the virus’ spread. He speaks Russian, his native language, and would not have been able to communicate well with the staff caring for him.

    Medicare Nursing Home Compare Search

     

    “It felt like admitting him [to a facility] would be like saying goodbye,” Bondar said. “Like leaving him to die.”

    Bondar’s family ultimately decided to care for her grandfather at home, in his Mayfield Heights senior highrise, where they could limit his exposure to the virus.

    Before his fall, an aide visited for about eight hours a week. After the Ohio’s “stay at home” order was put in place March 23, Bondar and her mother were able to work from home and pitch in with care.

    The advice of the Clinic’s Steven Schwartz led them to a hospice program, which helped the family find additional aides, including one who speaks Russian, as well as a hospital bed for safer sleeping and a wheelchair. 

    The home care route isn’t the easiest but Bondar said the family feels like they have more contact and control over the quality of care.

    The home care route isn’t the easiest but Bondar said the family feels like they have more contact and control over the quality of care. 

    “We’ll do this as long as we can manage it,” Bondar said. 

    Anecdotally, it is a choice more families are making: the decision to use home care or even pull family members out of nursing homes out of fear or because they miss them and can’t visit, Steven Schwartz said.

    “Sometimes it’s appropriate. But sometimes, even given everything, it may be safer to have your family member there to get stronger and get the necessary care,” said Steven Schwartz. “I would really try to balance the benefit of going to a nursing home versus the risk.”

    Patients with dementia or Alzehimer’s may be unsafe going back home.

    Patients with dementia or Alzehimer’s may be unsafe going back home, he said, and families may need to decide if a nursing home really is the safer place. 

    One of the first orders Ohio put in place to prevent the spread of COVID-19 was to halt in-person visitation in more than 900 nursing and long-term care facilities. The state is not yet ready to lift those restrictions and resume visits in those settings, Gov. Mike DeWine said,  but on June 8 will start allowing outdoor visits at assisted living facilities care centers for individuals with disabilities.  

     “We are not to nursing homes yet and I know that causes anguish for a lot of people who are watching this but we’re trying to do this so that we don’t increase the COVID inside the nursing homes or the assisted living or the immediate care facilities,” DeWine said during a May 28 briefing. 

    Decisions made harder

    Figuring out what kind of care might be best for a patient has become more challenging, too. 

    Previously, nurses and social workers would visit clients in their homes to assess how they functioned – whether they could independently bathe, cook and grocery shop, said Theresa Foster, a nurse and licensed social worker at Western Reserve Area Office on Aging.

    They relied on conversations with clients and family and also observations of the environment in the home and possible risks, said Foster, who runs the agency’s resource center. 

    Those assessments were used to determine whether a person could safely remain at home with community support or whether they needed facility-level care and what resources, whether subsidized or private, existed to pay for the services. 

    Now, those assessments are done by phone and can be done successfully, but it is more difficult, Foster said.

    At UH’s hospitals, medical staff use a scoring system to determine the best place for a patient being discharged, said Dr. Sean Cannone, UH’s medical director for population health.

    Patients are assessed on their ability to perform daily tasks and on their cognitive abilities. 

    “We’re trying as much as we can to get patients home if at all possible,” he said. The goal is to provide patients with resources so they can receive care in whichever setting they prefer. 

    The goal is to provide patients with resources so they can receive care in whichever setting they prefer.

    “We want to respond to what people really want for their own care,” Cannone said. 

    The shift started before COVID-19 cases surfaced but has accelerated as more families worry about potential exposure to the virus in congregate living situations. 

    As technology has advanced, the capabilities of what can be done in a patient’s home has also increased. In March, UH introduced a new patient management system, Massimo SafetyNet, for remote monitoring. 

    When patients are released from the emergency room or from a COVID-19 floor, providers now put a bluetooth sensor on their wrist — it looks like an Apple Watch — that streams data about a patient’s vitals to a central monitoring center, said Jonathan Sague, UH’s vice president of clinical operations. That way, providers can make sure a patient is safe at home. 

    Douglas Beach is the chief executive officer at Western Reserve Area Office on Aging

    Douglas Beach, chief executive officer at Western Reserve Area Office on Aging, has had firsthand experience weighing care decisions amid COVID-19 worries. His mother is rehabilitating in a nursing home after a six-week hospital stay related to a heart condition.

    Not being able to visit her in the hospital or the facility has been hard, Beach said. He and his brother, who is a doctor, had to make all of the arrangements by phone, including figuring the best way to transport her that would have the lowest risk of exposure to the virus. 

    “Home and community-based services is what I do,” Beach said. Part of his mission is to advocate for the setting that allows for any person, whether they are older adults or live with a disability, to be as independent as possible .

    But for his mother,  a nursing facility was the right choice because she needed 24-hour care that her family could not provide at home. 

    Beach said nursing homes have had to deal with an unprecedented set of circumstances: a new virus, initial unknowns about transmission and populations at extremely high risk for complications.

    Nursing homes will continue to play a vital role and will remain the best option for people who need more care than can be safely provided at home, Beach said.

    For the more than 9,500 clients his agency serves in Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain and Medina counties, delivering care at home, with health aides, nurses and community and family supports, has proven a low risk. As of mid-May only 35 clients had tested positive for the virus, he said. That is roughly 0.3% of clients, though not all clients are tested. 

    Managing COVID-19

    Cuyahoga County nursing homes have been paired with one of the area’s three largest hospital systems during the pandemic, Campbell said. The hospitals help the facilities both prepare for and respond to COVID-19 cases. 

    “The goal is when you have one patient in a nursing home with COVID is to make sure you don’t end up with 30 patients with COVID,” Campbell said. 

    UH developed what is being called a playbook for local nursing homes. The playbook gives facilities a plan for how to respond if there’s a COVID-19 outbreak on-site, said Sague, who works as a firefighter and medic on the weekends. 

    “It can be pretty startling and pretty alarming if they’re not ready for it,” Sague said. 

    The playbook gives guidelines on screening, triaging, determining exposure, testing and isolating those who test positive, as well as how to get personal protective equipment, increase staffing and to eventually reopen safely, Sague said.  

    Once a case is identified at a facility, what is known as an intercept team is dispatched — either virtually or in person — to help a nursing home handle it, he said. 

    Patrick Schwartz, director of strategic communications for LeadingAge Ohio, a long-term care trade association, said access to testing and safety equipment has been a consistent problem for Ohio’s nursing homes. 

    But in the past month or so, the state has made “a definite shift” and started prioritizing testing at nursing homes, which is helping, he said. 

    Patrick Schwartz said he hoped the expanded testing would enable facilities to test their entire population—  of residents and staff — so they can better limit the spread of the virus. 

    Throughout Ohio, populations that have received mass testing — health care workers, first responders, those incarcerated and those in nursing homes — have had higher numbers of positive cases. Many people with COVID-19 are asymptomatic, so it is unknown if they have the virus until they are tested.

    “Since this pandemic first reared its head, it was clear to long-term care providers that the front lines would be in long-term care,” Patrick Schwartz said. The populations at those congregate living facilities, many of whom are older and have multiple medical conditions, are among the most vulnerable for complications from COVID-19, he said. 

    In Cuyahoga County, and elsewhere, local health departments have deployed limited testing resources to nursing homes quickly in hopes of limiting spread in and between facilities and given guidance to homes about how to isolate patients and trace exposures between facilities to limit the spread of infection.

    Cuyahoga County Health Commissioner Terry Allan said nursing homes try to guard against outbreaks but have varying degrees of resources. The assistance from the National Guard will allow more residents and staff at facilities in Northeast Ohio to be tested, he said. 

    Support for this project was provided by the Center for Community Solutions. 

    Questions to ask:

    • How can family members stay in touch with residents while visiting is restricted? 
    • Does staff facilitate video visits? Is window visiting allowed?
    • How often will the facility provide updates on a resident’s condition?
    • How much COVID-19 testing is being done? Is the facility proactively testing patients or only those with symptoms?
    • Are private rooms available?
    • Do staffing ratios allow for residents to be taken outside?
    • Are residents currently restricted to rooms?
    • Are separate units and staffs used for COVID-19-positive patients and COVID-19-negative patients?
    • How does the facility work to limit COVID-19 complications?

    Additional Resources

    6 Questions to Ask if Your Loved One Is in a Quarantined Facility

    Senior Comfort Guide

    Ohio Long Term Care Consumer Guide

    Medicare Nursing Home Compare Search


    Results List Table for (25 miles) 45140

    Nursing home information
    Nursing home information

    Overall RatingSelect to sort Ascending or Descending
    Overall Rating Help

    Health inspectionsSelect to sort Ascending and Descending
    Health Inspection Help

    StaffingSelect to sort Ascending and Descending
    Staffing Help

    Quality measuresSelect to sort Ascending and Descending
    Quality Measures Help

    DistanceSorted ascending, Select to sort descending
    Distance help

    OTTERBEIN LOVELAND

    6405 SMALL HOUSE CIRCLE
    LOVELAND, OH 45122
    (513) 833-0472

    2 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Below Average

    2 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Below Average

    4 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Above Average

    1 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Below Average

    1.4
    Miles

    LOVELAND HEALTH CARE CENTER

    501 NORTH SECOND STREET
    LOVELAND, OH 45140
    (513) 605-6000

    4 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Above Average

    4 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Above Average

    1 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Below Average

    5 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Above Average

    2.6
    Miles

    FLORENTINE GARDENS

    409 WARDS CORNER ROAD
    LOVELAND, OH 45140
    (513) 630-1140

    5 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Above Average

    4 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Above Average

    2 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Below Average

    5 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Above Average

    3.4
    Miles

    ARBORS AT MILFORD

    5900 MEADOWCREEK DRIVE
    MILFORD, OH 45150
    (513) 248-1655

    1 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Below Average

    1 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Below Average

    2 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Below Average

    1 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Below Average

    4.2
    Miles

    THE LAURELS OF MILFORD

    934 STATE ROUTE 28
    MILFORD, OH 45150
    (513) 831-1770

    2 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Below Average

    2 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Below Average

    2 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Below Average

    4 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Above Average

    4.2
    Miles

    VENETIAN GARDENS

    1650 STATE ROUTE 28
    LOVELAND, OH 45140
    (513) 722-0700

    4 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Above Average

    4 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Above Average

    1 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Below Average

    5 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Above Average

    4.4
    Miles

    LODGE CARE CENTER INC THE

    9370 UNION CEMETERY ROAD
    LOVELAND, OH 45140
    (513) 677-4900

    4 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Above Average

    4 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Above Average

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average

    4 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Above Average

    5.2
    Miles

    MEADOWBROOK CARE CENTER

    8211 WELLER ROAD
    CINCINNATI, OH 45242
    (513) 489-2444

    4 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Above Average

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average

    2 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Below Average

    5 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Above Average

    6.3
    Miles

    OTTERBEIN AT MAINEVILLE This nursing home has been cited for abuse. For more information about this, please click, "About Nursing Home Compare" at the top of this page.

    201 MARGE SCHOTT WAY
    MAINEVILLE, OH 45039
    (513) 309-5650

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average

    2 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Below Average

    4 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Above Average

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average

    6.7
    Miles

    TWIN LAKES

    9840 MONTGOMERY ROAD
    CINCINNATI, OH 45242
    (513) 247-1301

    5 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Above Average

    5 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Above Average

    5 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Above Average

    5 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Above Average

    6.8
    Miles

    S.E.M. HAVEN HEALTH CARE CENTER

    225 CLEVELAND AVENUE
    MILFORD, OH 45150
    (513) 248-1270

    5 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Above Average

    5 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Above Average

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average

    5 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Above Average

    7.0
    Miles

    KENWOOD TERRACE CARE CENTER This nursing home has been cited for abuse. For more information about this, please click, "About Nursing Home Compare" at the top of this page.

    7450 KELLER ROAD
    CINCINNATI, OH 45243
    (513) 793-2255

    2 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Below Average

    2 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Below Average

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average

    7.5
    Miles

    BLUE ASH CARE CENTER

    4900 COOPER ROAD
    CINCINNATI, OH 45242
    (513) 793-3362

    1 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Below Average

    1 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Below Average

    1 out of 5 stars12footnote

    Much Below Average

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average

    7.7
    Miles

    MONTGOMERY CARE CENTER This nursing home has been cited for abuse. For more information about this, please click, "About Nursing Home Compare" at the top of this page.

    7777 COOPER ROAD
    CINCINNATI, OH 45242
    (513) 793-5092

    1 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Below Average

    1 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Below Average

    1 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Below Average

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average

    7.7
    Miles

    SANCTUARY POINTE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER

    11501 HAMILTON AVENUE
    CINCINNATI, OH 45231
    (513) 648-7000

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average

    2 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Below Average

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average

    5 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Above Average

    7.7
    Miles

    COURTYARD AT SEASONS

    7100 DEARWESTER DRIVE
    CINCINNATI, OH 45236
    (513) 984-7274

    5 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Above Average

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average

    4 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Above Average

    5 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Above Average

    8.1
    Miles

    MADEIRA HEALTH CARE CENTER

    6940 STIEGLER LANE
    CINCINNATI, OH 45243
    (513) 561-6400

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average

    4 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Above Average

    8.5
    Miles

    WEXFORD PLACE INC.

    3889 EAST GALBRAITH ROAD
    CINCINNATI, OH 45236
    (513) 793-5222

    2 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Below Average

    1 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Below Average

    1 out of 5 stars12footnote

    Much Below Average

    5 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Above Average

    8.6
    Miles

    WEXFORD CARE CENTER

    3875 EAST GALBRAITH ROAD
    CINCINNATI, OH 45236
    (513) 793-5222

    1 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Much Below Average

    2 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Below Average

    1 out of 5 stars12footnote

    Much Below Average

    4 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Above Average

    8.6
    Miles

    CEDAR VILLAGE SENIOR LIVING

    5467 CEDAR VILLAGE DRIVE
    MASON, OH 45040
    (513) 754-3100

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average

    3 out of 5 starsfootnote

    Average